869-pacific-082710.jpg
This one’s a real head-scratcher: Scaffolding’s down at 869 Pacific, revealing an, ahem, interesting facade indeed. Two different types of brick on the top floor and an orange hue on bottom. We’ve been seeing a lot of colorful touches on buildings recently—think they liven up the neighborhood or look too out of place?
Development Watch: 869 Pacific Street GMAP


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Based on the google streetview, this house had a lot of potential prior to this awful renovation. There are far better ways to add an addition floor and maximize square footage.

  2. Thank God I don’t live on THIS block. What a blight.

    There are so many hideous buildings going up – more the small ones – the big ones use architects who have some kind of sense and aesthetic. I think all builders should be required to hire me as a design consultant.

  3. I see via Property Shark that the building had keystones to begin with. Clearly the mistake of the architect was to not include keystones in the addition as well.

  4. Hey, it’s got keystones.

    Park Sloper – zoning regulates things like set back from the street, overall height, setbacks of upper stories, etc., but provides no aesthetic regulation. (This is in an R6B (aka “contextual”) zone – so by City Planning standards, this building is “contextual”.)

    Besides Landmarks, the only other agency that regulates aesthetics is the Public Design Commission (formerly the Art Commission), which regulates construction on city-owned property.

  5. Park Sloper, I don’t think there is any agency responsible for this. As long as it passes zoning and building code, anything goes in a non-landmarked neighborhood.

    I’d love to hear the thought process on this one. It really does look upside down, and is reminiscent of somewhere in the Middle East. Kinda looks like a giant inhaler with windows.

1 2 3 4