869-pacific-082710.jpg
This one’s a real head-scratcher: Scaffolding’s down at 869 Pacific, revealing an, ahem, interesting facade indeed. Two different types of brick on the top floor and an orange hue on bottom. We’ve been seeing a lot of colorful touches on buildings recently—think they liven up the neighborhood or look too out of place?
Development Watch: 869 Pacific Street GMAP


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Thank God I don’t live on THIS block. What a blight.

    There are so many hideous buildings going up – more the small ones – the big ones use architects who have some kind of sense and aesthetic. I think all builders should be required to hire me as a design consultant.

  2. Hey, it’s got keystones.

    Park Sloper – zoning regulates things like set back from the street, overall height, setbacks of upper stories, etc., but provides no aesthetic regulation. (This is in an R6B (aka “contextual”) zone – so by City Planning standards, this building is “contextual”.)

    Besides Landmarks, the only other agency that regulates aesthetics is the Public Design Commission (formerly the Art Commission), which regulates construction on city-owned property.

  3. Park Sloper, I don’t think there is any agency responsible for this. As long as it passes zoning and building code, anything goes in a non-landmarked neighborhood.

    I’d love to hear the thought process on this one. It really does look upside down, and is reminiscent of somewhere in the Middle East. Kinda looks like a giant inhaler with windows.

1 2 3 4