Register to leave a comment, or log in if you already have an account
“Kens, but what i am saying is that since it is such a close knit community and brokers will only show properties to people who are on the inside, why not sell the houses for $1? if not money laundering, why the high prices?”
i would imagine they are close knit – but not necessarily cooperative. when have you ever known rich people to cooperate to help everyone save money?
randi- if a house is particularly desirable, as these seem to be for the community, the competition to buy will be fierce. the seller is simply being..well, a good capitalist.
Scott- I said it was a matter of degrees and I stand by that. Objectifying people is a matter of degrees. I am not saying every relationship that is problematic means one or the other person disrespects an entire gender. But if someone is the type to objectify, then its a matter of degrees.
Uggghhhhh, agreeing with bxgrl.
To a certain extent, DSK’s problem is more about self destruction it would now seem than his fundamental problem of objectifying and abusing women.
Kens, but what i am saying is that since it is such a close knit community and brokers will only show properties to people who are on the inside, why not sell the houses for $1? if not money laundering, why the high prices?
Scott- I said it was a matter of degrees and I stand by that. Objectifying people is a matter of degrees. I am not saying every relationship that is problematic means one or the other person disrespects an entire gender. But if someone is the type to objectify, then its a matter of degrees.
“Kens, but what i am saying is that since it is such a close knit community and brokers will only show properties to people who are on the inside, why not sell the houses for $1? if not money laundering, why the high prices?”
i would imagine they are close knit – but not necessarily cooperative. when have you ever known rich people to cooperate to help everyone save money?
Yes, the gravesend house sales.
I think randi brings this up every time there is one. She’s got a brain like a goldfish…each trip around the bowl is a new experience!!!!!
randi- if a house is particularly desirable, as these seem to be for the community, the competition to buy will be fierce. the seller is simply being..well, a good capitalist.
By bxgrl on May 24, 2011 12:02 PM
Scott- I said it was a matter of degrees and I stand by that. Objectifying people is a matter of degrees. I am not saying every relationship that is problematic means one or the other person disrespects an entire gender. But if someone is the type to objectify, then its a matter of degrees.
Uggghhhhh, agreeing with bxgrl.
To a certain extent, DSK’s problem is more about self destruction it would now seem than his fundamental problem of objectifying and abusing women.
it’s never a simple answer with these things.
No dibs- I’m done discussing. We all have our own opinions. Or are you referring to the Gravesend thread? 🙂
“By daveinbedstuy on May 24, 2011 12:02 PM
OY, not this discussion again!!!!!!”
what should we discuss dave? gay stuff and puns?
Kens, but what i am saying is that since it is such a close knit community and brokers will only show properties to people who are on the inside, why not sell the houses for $1? if not money laundering, why the high prices?
OY, not this discussion again!!!!!!
Scott- I said it was a matter of degrees and I stand by that. Objectifying people is a matter of degrees. I am not saying every relationship that is problematic means one or the other person disrespects an entire gender. But if someone is the type to objectify, then its a matter of degrees.