open-thread-icon.jpg


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. you can just email the articles to yourself–I don’t think the Times really cares! And if you see a link on a blog or on facebook or you get one via the NY Times email-this-article, you can open it without it counting toward your 20 articles.

  2. It’s not rich, rf. Don’t care what the median number is.

    “Rich” is not actually a measure of income bu t a measure of wealth or assets. Most people making $250k have not accumulated sizeable assets.

    “Rich” is about net worth and anything below $2-3MM is NOT rich.

  3. Rf – oh the baby is good – he slept 6 hours last night – wooo hoooo – albeit it was from 9pm to 3am – but pretty surprising – he’s also eating a lot and getting sturdier -ha! Soon he can get a job and pay taxes!
    oh – see, I should have been emailing my friends random articles!!!

  4. Gem,

    I got a free year! I email a lot of articles and post some to Facebook so apparently I am a “leader” or some such bullshit. Maybe you should email your 20 free articles a month and you’ll get it too.

    How’s the babe?

  5. jessi, the real problem is that the democrats define “rich” at $250,000. I think most republicans would not have a problem if it was defined at income of say, $1.5 MM or so.

    But to call people making $250k “rich” is absurd. Whether the Dems know it or not, $250k is the middle class that they supposedly stand for

1 30 31 32 33 34 50