Open Thread


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Be that as it may, lechacal, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians is nothing to be happy about. What we unleashed then is something we are all going to live with (or die with).

  2. “By bxgrl on December 3, 2010 2:36 PM – Bravo Truman- hmmm. You think he could have detonated those bombs on military installations instead?”

    I have no idea. A lot of people have a lot of theories about how they would have made better decisions than the U.S. President and his advisors.

    But the facts are pretty stark here. The war ended almost immediately. Clearly what we did had the desired effect. Could we have gotten the same outcome with less horror? Who knows. The fact is, what we did worked.

    I’m delighted to be saying what we did worked and to speculate as to whether we might have ridden closer to the line and still gotten the same result. Thank God we’re not saying what we did wasn’t enough and speculating about how much more severe we would have to have been to end the war immediately.

    Decision makers should not be held to a standard of perfect decision making. They should be held to a standard of making defensible judgments and getting the right results.

  3. rob- I’m not the one who said the liked the fact we dropped a nuclear bomb on Japan. Is that the stuff of light conversation? Screw you and DH if you think stuff like that is funny.

  4. “The Japanese started it, and frankly I don’t give a damn how many Japanese civilians had to die to keep even a single additional U.S. soldier from dying.”

    game, set, match.

1 21 22 23 24 25 54