I wouldn’t quite say that. TARP was enacted in the dynamics of the election and the acute nature of the crisis. Remember when McCain “suspended” his campaign, went back to DC, and not only did nothing but couldn’t keep the republicans in line? Bush needed a majority of dems to pass it and Obama, as the standard bearer of the party through his candidacy had a choice to demagogue or to recognize that this was something that needed to be done, odious as it was. His approach during the campaign helped insure the votes were there. He had more at stake than Bush, who was leaving office in a few months. And now the tea party folks who hate TARP blame Obama for it because they think he signed it.
I started drinking tea. It’s an herbal blend for lactating women.
My platform in drinking this tea is:
– Increase production (of milk)
– Repeal negative healthcare issues to my baby
– Opposition to Formula
– Promote a bond between two parties of different generations.
My point, jester, is really that the Tea Party is pretty amorphous and serves as a bit of a rohrschach test. Everyone from tea partiers themselves to liberals sees in them what they want to see. I don’t think they re reducible to a coherent platform, but they are angry and numerous.
For example, lots of them hate TARP. But some hate TARP because they didn’t like the bank bailouts, and a subset of those blame Obama for signing TARP, which was signed by Bush. Others don’t like it because they’ve got it mixed up with ARRA and hate the stimulus spending. Still others — all of the above.
John Liu is NYC Comptroller, m4l. Hevesi was NYS.
“Obama had nothing to do with it.”
I wouldn’t quite say that. TARP was enacted in the dynamics of the election and the acute nature of the crisis. Remember when McCain “suspended” his campaign, went back to DC, and not only did nothing but couldn’t keep the republicans in line? Bush needed a majority of dems to pass it and Obama, as the standard bearer of the party through his candidacy had a choice to demagogue or to recognize that this was something that needed to be done, odious as it was. His approach during the campaign helped insure the votes were there. He had more at stake than Bush, who was leaving office in a few months. And now the tea party folks who hate TARP blame Obama for it because they think he signed it.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/hevesi_in_plea_talks_over_pension_L3O8438yCCcuh9DlIPL8PN
no need to worry as a HONEST Chinaman is now occupying that gig.
I started drinking tea. It’s an herbal blend for lactating women.
My platform in drinking this tea is:
– Increase production (of milk)
– Repeal negative healthcare issues to my baby
– Opposition to Formula
– Promote a bond between two parties of different generations.
By daveinbedstuy on September 29, 2010 12:21 PM
If I have a tea party on my deck will any of you come???
Yes, delighted. But only if it is HIGH TEA. With scones and clotted cream. And jam. ummm…
“If I have a tea party on my deck will any of you come?”
Yep, but only if you serve Pimm’s and cucumber sandwiches! ; )
My point, jester, is really that the Tea Party is pretty amorphous and serves as a bit of a rohrschach test. Everyone from tea partiers themselves to liberals sees in them what they want to see. I don’t think they re reducible to a coherent platform, but they are angry and numerous.
For example, lots of them hate TARP. But some hate TARP because they didn’t like the bank bailouts, and a subset of those blame Obama for signing TARP, which was signed by Bush. Others don’t like it because they’ve got it mixed up with ARRA and hate the stimulus spending. Still others — all of the above.
One more reason, Hal….Goldman started doing “god’s work.”
cobble: …then maybe I’ll respond to your endless annoying baiting…
THEN?! WHEN will we all?