“That should be the role of the government and it’s quite obvious that our government cannot spend it’s tax revenues efficintly or for the good of the governed.”
In other words, you don’t agree with the way the government spends, so the government should just stop spending. Real constructive philosophy you’ve got there.
Snappy — that’s what I keep trying to get at too! But he keeps falling back on the collapse of civilization argument, and never touches the 14th Amendment.
all gay men are cheaters and unfaithful (ALL) so when you see people fighting for the right to get married because of love and devotion, it’s just comes across as totally phoney. they just want the tax breaks and perks that straight people want… which is justifiable.. but let’s not pretend gay marriage is anything more than that. committment, fidelity? lol those are foreign words in the gay community, which is why i dont fall for their BS. i see it for what it really is. it’s why a lot of people dont take them seriously.
and i know that 50 % of str8 marriages fail.
but i will tell right now that 100% of gay marriages will fail. well not really, they will both cheat on each other and just remain married, unlike str8 people who often get a divorce when they are cheated on. gay people seem to just accept sleeping around and being a ho-bag as a fact of life and that’s why a lot of people (straight AND gay) have problems with gay culture.
stop being such dirty stank ho-bags and maybe youll get a little respect.
“Obamacare will be killed-off, one way or another, and it will be highly enjoyable to watch the progressive morons see their “triumph” not only reversed, but, in effect, to kill the Democrat Party for at least a generation.”
Well, if irrationally angry and bizarre individuals like you represent the Democratic party’s “opposition,” I’m not especially concerned.
“In a country with so much wealth, I think we can afford to look out a bit for those less fortunate.”
That should be the role of the government and it’s quite obvious that our government cannot spend it’s tax revenues efficintly or for the good of the governed.
And, it’ no longer Bush’s fault. it’s become much worse under the current administraion and it is escalating with the new layers and layers and layers of bueracracy.
Dave, I don’t want to attack him based on his beliefs, no matter how wrong I think he is. I just want an understanding of his position as an attorney that no EPC violations exist (if that is in fact what he is saying). I respect his right to hold that opinion. Truth is, Momma Snappy is an extremely religious woman who was mortified when I told her I was a lesbian. My mother is neither a neanderthal nor a backwards moron. And I wont’ ascribe those terms to BC either. As much as it hurts to know that she does not now and never will support me in this, I respect her deep and true religious beliefs and her right to feel the way she does. The difference with Momma Snappy and BrooklynCouch is the presence of the ESQ. after the name. If BC believes there’s no EPC violation, I just want to know what under the *law* he thinks supports that.
Rob — oh my.
“That should be the role of the government and it’s quite obvious that our government cannot spend it’s tax revenues efficintly or for the good of the governed.”
In other words, you don’t agree with the way the government spends, so the government should just stop spending. Real constructive philosophy you’ve got there.
Snappy;
I salute your TRULY liberal perspective above.
DCB, did you see the second bounce off of 1119??? You gotta be on top of these things. You’re worse than a referee in a World Cup game.
Snappy — that’s what I keep trying to get at too! But he keeps falling back on the collapse of civilization argument, and never touches the 14th Amendment.
all gay men are cheaters and unfaithful (ALL) so when you see people fighting for the right to get married because of love and devotion, it’s just comes across as totally phoney. they just want the tax breaks and perks that straight people want… which is justifiable.. but let’s not pretend gay marriage is anything more than that. committment, fidelity? lol those are foreign words in the gay community, which is why i dont fall for their BS. i see it for what it really is. it’s why a lot of people dont take them seriously.
and i know that 50 % of str8 marriages fail.
but i will tell right now that 100% of gay marriages will fail. well not really, they will both cheat on each other and just remain married, unlike str8 people who often get a divorce when they are cheated on. gay people seem to just accept sleeping around and being a ho-bag as a fact of life and that’s why a lot of people (straight AND gay) have problems with gay culture.
stop being such dirty stank ho-bags and maybe youll get a little respect.
*rob*
“Obamacare will be killed-off, one way or another, and it will be highly enjoyable to watch the progressive morons see their “triumph” not only reversed, but, in effect, to kill the Democrat Party for at least a generation.”
Well, if irrationally angry and bizarre individuals like you represent the Democratic party’s “opposition,” I’m not especially concerned.
“In a country with so much wealth, I think we can afford to look out a bit for those less fortunate.”
That should be the role of the government and it’s quite obvious that our government cannot spend it’s tax revenues efficintly or for the good of the governed.
And, it’ no longer Bush’s fault. it’s become much worse under the current administraion and it is escalating with the new layers and layers and layers of bueracracy.
Dave, I don’t want to attack him based on his beliefs, no matter how wrong I think he is. I just want an understanding of his position as an attorney that no EPC violations exist (if that is in fact what he is saying). I respect his right to hold that opinion. Truth is, Momma Snappy is an extremely religious woman who was mortified when I told her I was a lesbian. My mother is neither a neanderthal nor a backwards moron. And I wont’ ascribe those terms to BC either. As much as it hurts to know that she does not now and never will support me in this, I respect her deep and true religious beliefs and her right to feel the way she does. The difference with Momma Snappy and BrooklynCouch is the presence of the ESQ. after the name. If BC believes there’s no EPC violation, I just want to know what under the *law* he thinks supports that.