Open Thread


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I’m not 100% positive, but I think they have some arbitrators on staff full time and employ some on a per hearing basis. The problem may be that there are a ton of existing cases and many more pop up throughout the year.

  2. quote:
    Gonna stay away from the ROTD today – Bread Stuy just isn’t very good!!

    i love how when a run of the mill yuppie bakery opens up in a place where that hasnt been seen before it suddenly becomes a “neighborhood institituion” and something more than what it is. :-/

    *rob*

  3. And then if a backlog of cases piles up, they can use outside arbitrators temporarily, with the guideline that every case will be heard within one year (or less).

  4. you know what might work: the city/union have full-time arbitrators, in a permanent space, who hear arbitrations full-time, and who are salaried. They would be familiar with the industry and the sensitive minor-related issues. The grievants get a hearing date the moment the file. Maybe they go to a mediation step where they have a chance to take a walk. The system would be way cheaper and more efficient.

1 14 15 16 17 18 37