62-montague-st-092810.jpg
This two-bedroom in Brooklyn Heights is a rent-by-owner coming from the Brownstoner Marketplace with a price tag of $2,950 a month. It has all the pre-war charms you’d expect, and the building’s architecture and location are definitely a major selling point. It is also is a co-op, so board approval (and the $300 application fee) are required, but overall this is not a high asking price for a rental in Brooklyn Heights these days so we won’t be surprised to see it get snapped up.
62 Montague Street [For Rent By Owner] GMAP P*Shark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Years ago I rented a co-op, and I had to put together a package for the board just as extensive as if I were buying the place. They didn’t require a year’s worth of rent in reserve or anything like that, but other than that, they looked at everything: salary, bank balances, employment history, personal references, the works. And then I had to move again in two years when the owners finally decided to sell!

  2. That line of apartments is not small. However, I suspect it is true that one cannot stay there beyond three years (the usual co-op limit). Another way to look at it is that the renter would be first in line to buy should the shareholder not wish to return.

    PS: Montrose, you are becoming famous!

  3. If it’s JUST $300, it’s cheap for renting in a co-op. The ones I’m familiar with in BH soak you for much more PLUS move-in and move-out fees, and require time-consuming and invasive financial documentation. It is a very good way to test out a coop before buying into one, however.

  4. I’d move in tomorrow, but I wouldn’t ever want to move out, is the thing. That place looks fabulous, and I have a soft spot for Montague street. I agree, price seems low… I’m assuming it’s sort of small?

    And what more4 says is true, I bet. Wouldn’t be a long-term rental. Although maybe they’re trying to sell too?

    Whatever, this is a great apartment.

  5. I suspect any potential renter will have to show financials nearly as good as a potential buyer, including probably a year’s rent in reserve. So that would account for the low price (Yes, it’s low).

    Co-ops DO NOT want to deal with deadbeat tenants. (Yeah, I know, would be the shareholder’s problem but these things have a way of spiraling out of control).

1 2 3