lwbs-1-19-10.jpg
1. HOMECREST $3,000,000
1771 East 9th Street GMAP (left)
This is a 5,138-sf, single-family, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 11/2/09; closed on 12/29/09; deed recorded on 1/14/10.

2. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS $2,325,000
169 State Street GMAP (right)
When this 3,540-sf two-family was a House of the Day in May, it was listed for $2,995,000. Its asking price was reduced to $2,495,000 in September. Entered into contract on 11/1/09; closed on 1/6/10; deed recorded on 1/15/10.

3. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS $2,133,233
360 Furman Street #519 GMAP
This is a 2,295-square-foot, 4-bedroom unit in One Brooklyn Bridge Park, according to StreetEasy. The condo was first listed for $2,725,000 in ’07. Sale included a parking spot. Entered into contract on 10/28/09; closed on 12/29/09; deed recorded on 1/15/10.

4. FORT GREENE $1,900,000
98 South Oxford Street GMAP
This wood-frame was listed for $1,995,000 in September, according to StreetEasy. Entered into contract on 10/28/09; closed on 1/12/10; deed recorded on 1/15/10.

5. COBBLE HILL $1,750,000
29 Tiffany Place, PH4 GMAP
This is a 2,500-sf condo with a private terrace, according to its listing. Its seller purchased it for $1,375,000 in 2005. Entered into contract on 10/29/09; closed on 12/29/09; deed recorded on 1/14/10.

Photos from Property Shark.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Tybur6;

    I am personally in favor of a system that taxed producers less (i.e. income taxes) and taxed consumption more. There should be more of a balance between the two. However, it should be “behaviour-neutral” and that is where I part company with you. If a person honestly earns his money, he should be entitled to spend it anyway he or she pleases.

    How would you draw the line? A large house seems to upset you, but we could go further. Should overseas vacations ( a huge energy hog) be banned? How about vacation homes? Cruises?

    Live, and let live!

  2. 1) $583psf outside bkln brownstone. is there a syrian synagogue nearby?
    2) actually 22% off ask, ‘ho.
    3) you did your sums well here.
    4) 100% exageration. actually 2.5% off ask
    5) up 25% since ’05

    hmm, is it:
    A) well you have to hit 583 before getting to 300?
    B) you have to go through 20%/2.5% off ask to get to 20% off comps to get to 50% of comps?
    C) you have to go through 25% up comps to get to 50% off?
    D) all of the above?

  3. joe/11217 – I said average. 5% is no less an outlier than the 30% in sale No. 2. How’d you guys miss that?

    ———–

    Point taken. Anyway, I just needed an excuse to call 11217 a clownstoner…

  4. Price tags don’t make any difference in this city?

    Anyway, this is what I think. Attempts to regulate, curtail, or outright outlaw what you might call “consumerism” is a dangerous road to go down.

    (Yes, the skewed property taxation is ridiculous.)

  5. (Oh, and Pete, I don’t even think my house was 4,000 sq ft when I was a kid… I think it was more like 3,000. But I don’t think anyone would believe that 9 people could *possibly* fit into 3,000 sq ft.)

  6. “Peak ask means absolutely zero” is an absolute exaggeration. Some are ridiculously high. Most are very close to actual comps (+/- 10%). Not as accurate as comps but the next best thing when comps aren’t readily available. If anyone disagrees, how much off would you say a typical ask is from comp?

    ***Help Haiti***

1 2 3 4 5 6 7