132-Saint-Marks-Avenue-1008.jpg
Someone went all out on the renovation at 132 St. Marks Avenue in Prospect Heights. The plaster and wood moldings have been restored to perfection and a large deck has been added off the parlor floor. The kitchen renovation doesn’t quite work for us aesthetically, but it certainly wasn’t a corner-cutting job. There are bound to be plenty of people who would love to own this house. The big question is whether they’ll be willing to pay $2,485,000 for the privilege.
132 St. Marks Avenue [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Very nice. This place will be an interesting bellwether of the market. I’m hoping it’ll get 2.4. If not, I’ll seriously have to re-appraise my place, which I seriously do not want to do.

    I have an open question about 1- versus multi-family dwellings. Are 1-family’s generally more valuable per square foot, all things being equal? I always figured that a multi-family would bring in more buyers and thus demand a higher price. What’s the conventional wisdom?

  2. That’s a rather far fetched concern with respect to garden rentals in a 2 family, and in any event, I would imagine any change in law would have a phase in provision and/or a grandfather clause that would not serve to adjust existing leases.

  3. Maybe there’s a lesson to be learned here, and that is, if you’re going to restore a house with an eye toward a someday-big resale, you had better get it back to as original condition as possible. This house probably qualifies as “move-in condition,” or as near to it as most of us would deem possible, and yet there are still all sorts of complaints. I for one like the original design with the kitchen/dining room on the first, garden, level, and the two parlors as two parlors. And I don’t like the design of the bookcases here. I wonder if the owners renovated it entirely to their own taste (“this is the house I’ll die in”) or did they renovate to re-sell? Does anyone know?
    Too, the longer I try and turn back the tide on more than 100 years of wear and tear and 50 years of minor architectural vandalism, the more I think that a house in truly move-in condition, one where I didn’t have to think about odd pieces of cast-iron, missing curved doorbells, and mismatched knobbery, let alone the history of linoleum and the history of electricity on display, the more I think a house in “move-in condition” would cost, uhmmm, $4 million.

  4. I think there’s an awful lot of nitpicking going on here today regarding this house. We haven’t seen very many with architectural detail as grand as this. The kitchen is a very nice job and I think the whole thing is pretty top notch. All of the opinions about what should be on each floor are valid but they are all individual preferences.

    I think you should all chill out and probably could use a drink or two. I know i do and I know where to get one in about 3 1/2 hours.

  5. I think this place is beautiful, and I don’t think I’d want the kitchen on a different floor to the dining room, too much carrying of trays up and down stairs. Of course when the brownstone design was developed, most middle class families had a live in housekeeper and a maid to do all the fetching and carrying. I can think of lots of reasons why I wouldn’t want to rent out a garden level apartment – the risk of getting a horrible tenant, the loss of privacy, but most of all I don’t like the sounds that are coming from Albany. With the possibility/probability of a Democratic majority in both House and Senate, as well as a Democratic Governor, there are quite a few in the Democratic Party salivating at the thought of extending rent stabilization by raising the luxury threshold and extending the coverage to all rental units. Quite frankly, if I had a garden unit at the moment, I would not be renewing the tenant’s lease until that situation became crystal clear. I don’t think that single units in a two family house have ever been regulated and probably won’t ever be, but some rent stabilization advocates are quite extreme and would like to extend their reach everywhere. Just a thought.

  6. This place is beautiful.

    On the layout issue, we live in a brownstone, in the upper triplex over garden rental. It’s a wide place (22.5 feet wide) so our kitchen and dining room in the back parlor area is spacious and nice (more of a galley type kitchen with a large counter/peninsula separating it from the dining room. Plenty of seating for 12 at the dining table etc for big gatherings.

    That said, if I had the luxury of a 1 family of the same sort of size as our place, and unlimited funds to renovate/restore, I’d make the kichen on the ground floor where the original one was, in the back, with the formal dining room in the from. I would open up the back wall at the garden level so the kitchen would have a wall of windows and glass doors to the garden. That way you could have a nice, large, bright eat in kitchen, and up front a beautiful formal dining room with fireplace.

    I personally don’t care about having my living space (e.g. where I watch movies on TV and generally lie around) on the same level as where I prepare and eat meals. I’d put that on the parlor floor, probably in the back parlor as a library/den, with the front parlor as formal living and music/piano room.

    But, poor me, I only have three floors to live on so we can’t do this (sarcasm intended).

  7. I hear you ditto. I do think even if I was spectacularly wealthy I might rent out the garden. Not being spectacularly wealthy though this is a pointless argument….But your point is ultimately correct, whoever can afford a house this expensive is not going to be putting 15% down and trying to make the mortgage through rental income. Anyone rich enough to buy this house at this price is going to buy it outright.

1 2 3 4