Register to leave a comment, or log in if you already have an account
Post hoc rationalization involves a plastic change in neuronal circutry, so you’re already in it by then. But anyway, we’re talking about attraction in the first instance (it was a bar situation right?) not relationship termination.
“Most dudes find chicks attractive for a combination of reasons, rather than a binary smart/hot choice.â€
Are you trying to say that Jackal’s raw power/lofty pontificating is also too simplistic? 🙂
“Which is still assuming that it’s all about what the dude decides, which is still sexist.â€
If I’m talking to a dude and then some other chick shows up who is hotter, it’s his pick, not mine. It’s not sexist, just situational. The same works vice versa if some hotter dude walks in and starts chatting me up.
“I’m simply arguing that what makes said parts attractive is not merely their raw physical characteristics (I believe that being into the tit without the rest of the individual would be technically fetishization, but i’m not sure – it’s been a while since psych). Most dudes find chicks attractive for a combination of reasons, rather than a binary smart/hot choice. ”
not at 4am on a saturday night after drinking a half litre of jameson
Post hoc rationalization involves a plastic change in neuronal circutry, so you’re already in it by then. But anyway, we’re talking about attraction in the first instance (it was a bar situation right?) not relationship termination.
dh – at 4am on a saturday night after drinking 1/2 L jameson, I’d say neither criterion is relevant.
stripper boobs are nice if rest of the bod is stripper like.
Pimm’s cup
ditto- so, any person you date could have a catastrophic brain injury without altering your relationship?
“Most dudes find chicks attractive for a combination of reasons, rather than a binary smart/hot choice.â€
Are you trying to say that Jackal’s raw power/lofty pontificating is also too simplistic? 🙂
“Which is still assuming that it’s all about what the dude decides, which is still sexist.â€
If I’m talking to a dude and then some other chick shows up who is hotter, it’s his pick, not mine. It’s not sexist, just situational. The same works vice versa if some hotter dude walks in and starts chatting me up.
“I’m simply arguing that what makes said parts attractive is not merely their raw physical characteristics (I believe that being into the tit without the rest of the individual would be technically fetishization, but i’m not sure – it’s been a while since psych). Most dudes find chicks attractive for a combination of reasons, rather than a binary smart/hot choice. ”
not at 4am on a saturday night after drinking a half litre of jameson
“Most dudes find chicks attractive for a combination of reasons, rather than a binary smart/hot choice.”
No, thats post-hoc rationalization.
ROFLMAO JB