CH_d73e9635d8.jpg
Citing some of the discussions on this blog, real estate mag The Real Deal puts the Crown Heights market in its place this month with an article entitled, “Sellers Swallowing Their Pride in Crown Heights.” While not dismissing the nabe’s merits, the basic thesis is that the market got ahead of itself and there’re are lots of homeowners with a deluded sense of what their places are worth. (Yesterday’s HOTD is further proof of that phenomenon.) Several brokers are surprisingly frank about clients who insisted on slapping ridiculous prices on their houses, only to have them languish on the market. Here’s a great anecdote:

Kevin McNeill, a senior vice president at Corcoran, is all too familiar with this phenomenon. He points to a three-story townhouse he helped put on the market for $1.2 million back in June. “It was overpriced, but her next-door neighbor had listed at $1.4 million,” says McNeill. “Hers was similar [to her neighbor’s], and when she saw $1.4 million it was hard to talk her off the ledge.” For two months the home languished. Then in August the seller agreed to drop the price by about $100,000, but still it sat. It wasn’t until McNeill convinced her to lower the price below $1 million that the house sold. “The minute we brought it to $995,000, we sold it within days,” says McNeill. “We closed at $960,000.”

The implicit conclusion of the article, which we’d agree with, seems to be that in the new, post-subprime paradigm, $1 million is a huge psychological barrier in Crown Heights, as it is for most of Bed Stuy. But as Corcoran’s McNeill says, “When people talk about price reductions in these neighborhoods, it’s not about the market, it’s about improper pricing.”
Sellers Swallowing Their Pride in Crown Heights [The Real Deal]
Photo by gkjarvis


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. Hi NOP. Thanks for the invite. I’m definitely part of the BCHM. I did not grow up there, nor do I live there now, but my husband and I are looking at houses and I’m completely infatuated with the area. It feels like an oasis.
    Susan Elkins

  2. The posts in the Brooklynian may be commonplace, but when you actually read them, there is usually more smoke than fire. Not to downgrade anyone’s frightening experience with crime, but they are hardly representative of the entire neighborhood.

  3. If you compare the crime stats of the 77th precinct (Crown Heights North) today with the crime stats of the 76th precinct (Carroll Gardens) from 1990, you will see that the overall crime rate in Crown Heights is lower (1,431) than the Carroll Gardens crime rate in 1990 (2,719). I moved to CG around 1990 and felt perfectly safe, so these facts say loads about the level of safety in Crown heights today.

  4. I disagree with Montrose Morris’s absurd comment about brooklynian.com. Of course people will not post about times when they walk home without incident, but that hardly refutes the point that Crown Heights has a high crime rate. It is the absence of posts about violent crime that are telling. If you go to the Park Slope board on brooklynian.com, you see few posts about violent crime, but if you go to the Crown Heights board, they are commonplace.

  5. I agree that Montrose Morris appears to have graduated from the Norman Oder School of Journalism. Ditto for Nostalgic on Park Avenue. These two can’t express an opinion in less than 1000 words.

1 2 3 7