100-st-marks-avenue-0509.jpg
This brownstone at 100 St. Mark’s Avenue looks like one of the more fairly-priced deals we’ve seen recently. The four-story house is divided into an upper owner’s triplex and ground-floor rental (which currently fetches $1,500). Other than the choice of kitchen cabinets, we’re really liking the original charm of this place. As referenced above, the price tag of $1,575,000 looks quite reasonable to us. Do you agree?
100 St. Mark’s Avenue [Warren Lewis] GMAP P*Shark



What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Not my nabe so can’t guess if price is right. But I’d love to see a blind experiment with the Brownstoner assessment tool: take the same house, show it priced at $1.5M to one group and $1.8M to another.

    Do the two groups assess it around the same price, or do they both just knock X% off whatever the price is?

    Reason I wonder is this is relevant to the question: is it really a good idea to “price it to move”? Or will people simply assume that anything, at any price, is roughly 25% too high these days, and bid accordingly? Logic tells me price-to-move makes sense but logic doesn’t always hold.

  2. am not saying this is not priced well…But it is priced at approx $627 sq ft (and I’m being generous using 4 story 16 1/2 x 38′ – since top floor doesn’t really look full ceiling ht).
    and little backyard space and probably no extra FAR – and what school is zoned for?

  3. The price seems reasonable but one can always negotiate, the interiors look awesome.
    [url=http://www.legalhelpers.com]bankruptcy[/url]
    [url=http://www.2hugenutrition.com/home.cfm]halodrol[/url]

  4. “$1,575,000 looks quite reasonable to us. Do you agree?”

    You pay over a million to live in Brooklyn with a tenant and no backyard. I would agree perhaps for $600K and I *have* money and job.

1 2 3