712-Degraw-Street-0608.jpg
At first glance, $1,395,000 for a house on Degraw Street sounded cheap to us. Now we’re not so sure. It turns out that the building is only three-stories tall and 16.5-feet wide. If the two-family house is truly in “great shape” and has “lots of original detail,” as the listing says, it could still be well worth it There’s no mention of any significant renovation or upgrades since the property last changed hands in 2003 for $667,000 but a doubling in price in the last five years doesn’t sound crazy. Guess it all comes down to what those interiors look like.
712 Degraw Street [Leslie J. Garfield] GMAP P*Shark
Photo by Kate Leonova for PropertyShark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I thought “C” word was “changing” as in market is changing. Something a lot of sellers/brokers clearly don’t want to hear – hence all the angry comments and vociferous denial whenever this discussion comes up.

  2. Corcoran also shaved $50K off 106 Lincoln, though hardly enough to make a difference. They should borrow a page from Corcoran’s 12th St house playbook. If you want something to move, trim at least 200K and then maybe you’ll get some action.

  3. 3:17 – why would this sell in a heartbeat when it took Corcoran 2 months to sell a much nicer house on same block asking same price, and the house did not get the ask? Granted 2 months is not a long time, but the house in question was beautifully renovated, whereas this one looks like a nightmare. And why so vitiolic, calling everyone “idiots” – this kind of language smacks of fear/anxiety/anger that market is changing.

1 4 5 6 7 8 12