712-Degraw-Street-0608.jpg
At first glance, $1,395,000 for a house on Degraw Street sounded cheap to us. Now we’re not so sure. It turns out that the building is only three-stories tall and 16.5-feet wide. If the two-family house is truly in “great shape” and has “lots of original detail,” as the listing says, it could still be well worth it There’s no mention of any significant renovation or upgrades since the property last changed hands in 2003 for $667,000 but a doubling in price in the last five years doesn’t sound crazy. Guess it all comes down to what those interiors look like.
712 Degraw Street [Leslie J. Garfield] GMAP P*Shark
Photo by Kate Leonova for PropertyShark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Another listing with few details other than to curiously refer to this as a “charming townhouse”. Nothing in the brief description or picture suggests anything close to charming. This broker effort is worse than the Douglas Elliman listing in the Co-op of the Day. With this kind of representation, there’s a strong argument for doing a FSBO.

  2. I’m with you 1:43. People expecting to get double what they paid for a house is what has us in the mess we are in now . That is not how Real Estate should work. Just because it did in the last few years does not mean that it was the norm. It should take about 20 years for a double or more return in a healthy, normal market, not 5 years. Either you don’t know what you are talking about or you are just insane. Using your math, a starter home in the year 2012 should be about 10mil.

1 10 11 12