Actors Rose Byrne and Bobby Cannavale Pay $2.15 Million for Boerum Hill Townhouse
More celebrities are migrating to Brooklyn from Manhattan. Actors Rose Byrne and Bobby Cannavale, who had been living in the East Village, paid $2,150,000 earlier this month for a two-family, three-bedroom townhouse at 453 Warren Street in Boerum Hill. The couple starred together in the 2014 remake of Annie. Byrne and Cannavale’s new pad has both front…
More celebrities are migrating to Brooklyn from Manhattan. Actors Rose Byrne and Bobby Cannavale, who had been living in the East Village, paid $2,150,000 earlier this month for a two-family, three-bedroom townhouse at 453 Warren Street in Boerum Hill. The couple starred together in the 2014 remake of Annie.
Byrne and Cannavale’s new pad has both front and rear gardens, and a fireplace. The listing also advertises that the garden-level full-floor apartment could potentially be used as a commercial space, although with Cannavale set to star in HBO’s forthcoming series Vinyl and Byrne tied to the X-Men franchise, it seems unlikely that they’ll need the extra income from a ground-floor dentist.
[Source: NYDN | Photos: Sotheby’s]
Related Stories
Singer Norah Jones Is Buyer of $6.35 Million “Eat, Pray, Love” Cobble Hill Carriage House
OkCupid Cofounder Makes a Match With Greenpoint Building
Jennifer Connelly’s Former Park Slope Mansion Sells, Does Not Eclipse New Brooklyn Record
I find it reprehensible my burrito at chipotle was $11
I find it reprehensible my burrito at chipotle was $11
They can’t be that big and famous if can only afford a $2.15m house on a so/so block. I have never heard of them.
I agree, edificerex. I made a long comment about this on the recent Norah Jones article.
It’s not grandstanding – two wrongs do not make a right. Why perpetuate the intrusion? The Daily News is the benchmark? And putting it on a blog is a bit different than having to look it up on ACRIS. It’s a big leap to think that using their own names for purchase means they are not adverse to publicity.
Brownstoner, leave these people alone. It also effects the people who live on their street.
It’s not grandstanding – two wrongs do not make a right. Why perpetuate the intrusion? The Daily News is the benchmark? And putting it on a blog is a bit different than having to look it up on ACRIS. It’s a big leap to think that using their own names for purchase means they are not adverse to publicity.
Brownstoner, leave these people alone. It also effects the people who live on their street.
GDS
GDS
I agree, edificerex. I made a long comment about this on the recent Norah Jones article.