You may say they are the same and “quibbling” but a scientist would not, nor an arms expert, nor the army. And that was my point, which you failed to understand, that something beyond conventional weapons be used. Go back and read it again. read it until you understand it.
No, bxgrl, they are not and nor should they be. Like I said above, it was your problem that you equated atomic (as in WWII and Japan, of which we were speaking) and nuclear.
dibs- I most certainly do know the difference. And i will say it again- the net effect will be the same. If you think the scale will make much difference, you’re wrong.
Dona, was there anything in there on natural gas and its use as a fuel for trucks???
You may say they are the same and “quibbling” but a scientist would not, nor an arms expert, nor the army. And that was my point, which you failed to understand, that something beyond conventional weapons be used. Go back and read it again. read it until you understand it.
Thank you, rf!!!
Have fun on your date Donatella!
No, bxgrl, they are not and nor should they be. Like I said above, it was your problem that you equated atomic (as in WWII and Japan, of which we were speaking) and nuclear.
FAIL.
You say fission, I say fusion- let’s call the whole thing off.
I am working….sigh…..a woman’s work is never done.
The Senate tax bill that was signed today contains all the ethanol tax credits and tariffs…..
However, as much as I would like to stay here all night writing about it, I have a date. And really must go….
dibs- I most certainly do know the difference. And i will say it again- the net effect will be the same. If you think the scale will make much difference, you’re wrong.
“atomic is not the same as nuclear.”
Quibbling.