I agree with MM that teaching a different point of view is intellectually valid.
But it is only valid as long as the point of view is that of the contemporaries based on original sources, and not something imposed by society’s current assumptions.
“The second you pass judgment like that, it is absolutely fair to claim that the other guy would have done the same thing in a second if given the resources. ”
It’s fair to claim that, but it doesn’t change what actually happened. One side has historical “fact”, while the other side as pure specualtion.
Dibs – what do you mean make a cake with a whiskey glass?
are you serious? wouldn’t the glass break under the heat of the oven?
I agree with MM that teaching a different point of view is intellectually valid.
But it is only valid as long as the point of view is that of the contemporaries based on original sources, and not something imposed by society’s current assumptions.
LOUD NOISES!!!!!!!!!! LOUD NOISES!!!!!!!
I wish I was a cubicle slave 🙁
I’m sticking to the chocolate cake chat going on here 🙂
“The second you pass judgment like that, it is absolutely fair to claim that the other guy would have done the same thing in a second if given the resources. ”
It’s fair to claim that, but it doesn’t change what actually happened. One side has historical “fact”, while the other side as pure specualtion.
::DAVIS FOR GOVERNOR::
🙂
Expert – I am going there for my 3pm dessert fix!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
will let you know what I think – but i trust your judgement!
“equitable treatment of all its citizens?” – says the straight man.
Cubicles are the new corner offices.