I can’t believe people are criticizing Al Gore for making money. He is also doing something he truly believes in and most sane people would consider it a good cause. Improving the planet is bad…HOW?
Posted by: 11217 at November 5, 2009 4:13 PM
One of Gore’s global warming advisors, CEO Timothy LaSalle, told Gore’s team that CO2 emissions could be neutralized completely by clever use of agriculture and technology, without the need for a global carbon tax or the use of cap and trade systems that Gore, along with people like the Rothschilds, Maurice Strong and Barack Obama, have a huge financial stake in promoting.
The Newsweek article states:
“If we feed the biology and manage grasslands appropriately, we could sequester as much carbon as we emit,†says Timothy LaSalle, CEO of the Rodale Institute, who presented at two summits. The political clash is this: if you tell people soils can be managed to suck up lots of our carbon emissions, it sounds like a get-out-of-jail-free card, and could decrease what little enthusiasm there is for reducing those emissions—as one of Gore’s assistants told LaSalle in asking him to dial down his estimate. (He didn’t.)
So there you have it – LaSalle proposed a way of solving the CO2 issue but was basically told to shove it by Gore’s team because the methods he advocated would eliminate the need for what Gore and his cronies are really pursuing, nightmare regulation, taxation, and control over American’s lives, along with billions of dollars flooding into the coffers of Gore and the rest of the “carbon billionaire†globalists via the carbon trading systems they own.
go look at a 3 dimensional sonogram of a six month fetus and come back here to tell us that that is NOT a human being in there.
I suspect your ideas of what’s right and wrong will be re-defined. mind you, I’m not advocating a particular side on the abortion issue. Just pointing out the science of it.
“What if I told you guys that I could potentially arrange for free tequilla for your next gathering?”
I would say, Snappy has to eat the worm, and please join us on December 3rd Brokedeveloper.
Sigh. No one is willing to fry my rice? Not even for a free portion? Damn.
I’m not getting into an argument about abortion with you, Legion. I believe the woman has the right to choose what to do with her body. Period.
“What if I told you guys that I could potentially arrange for free tequilla for your next gathering?”
You would be my new bestest friend!
Well, we already have The Worm; it only makes sense we add the tequila!
stevieB is busy in the Thursday Links thread.
I can’t believe people are criticizing Al Gore for making money. He is also doing something he truly believes in and most sane people would consider it a good cause. Improving the planet is bad…HOW?
Posted by: 11217 at November 5, 2009 4:13 PM
One of Gore’s global warming advisors, CEO Timothy LaSalle, told Gore’s team that CO2 emissions could be neutralized completely by clever use of agriculture and technology, without the need for a global carbon tax or the use of cap and trade systems that Gore, along with people like the Rothschilds, Maurice Strong and Barack Obama, have a huge financial stake in promoting.
The Newsweek article states:
“If we feed the biology and manage grasslands appropriately, we could sequester as much carbon as we emit,†says Timothy LaSalle, CEO of the Rodale Institute, who presented at two summits. The political clash is this: if you tell people soils can be managed to suck up lots of our carbon emissions, it sounds like a get-out-of-jail-free card, and could decrease what little enthusiasm there is for reducing those emissions—as one of Gore’s assistants told LaSalle in asking him to dial down his estimate. (He didn’t.)
So there you have it – LaSalle proposed a way of solving the CO2 issue but was basically told to shove it by Gore’s team because the methods he advocated would eliminate the need for what Gore and his cronies are really pursuing, nightmare regulation, taxation, and control over American’s lives, along with billions of dollars flooding into the coffers of Gore and the rest of the “carbon billionaire†globalists via the carbon trading systems they own.
11217,
or stated more succinctly:
go look at a 3 dimensional sonogram of a six month fetus and come back here to tell us that that is NOT a human being in there.
I suspect your ideas of what’s right and wrong will be re-defined. mind you, I’m not advocating a particular side on the abortion issue. Just pointing out the science of it.
Free tequila with this crowd could be dangerous!