union-hall-1-05-2008.jpg
Last night Community Board 6’s landmarks/land-use committee dealt a harsh (albeit symbolic) blow to local watering hole and performance space Union Hall. After a lengthy and often rancorous public hearing about renewing the Park Slope bar and venue’s liquor license, the committee voted 6 to 2 in favor of a motion that denies Union Hall a renewal unless the business’s owners sign a contract stipulating that they will take measures to ameliorate noise, such as stopping the sale of alcohol after midnight. Although the motion is ultimately only advisory, the committee member who introduced it—Lou Sones, who himself owns a bar, The Brazen Head on Atlantic Avenue—described it as the community board’s “nuclear weapon” in terms of being a powerful indication to the State Liquor Authority that Union Hall is disturbing the lives of nearby residents. The motion was introduced after a two-hour-long pubic hearing in which many supporters of Union Hall, which is on Union Street between 5th and 6th avenues, spoke about how much they appreciated the business. A good number of residents who live near the establishment, meanwhile, described how noise from the business and its patrons was negatively affecting their quality of life. More people at the hearing, in fact, spoke out in support of Union Hall than against it. Find out what they had to say, and read the anti-UH faction’s claims, on the jump…

union-hall-2-05-2008.JPGThe business’s boosters said Union Hall is a great deal more than just a bar or rock venue. One of the people who runs the club’s Secret Science Club, for example, noted that his group has brought three Nobel Laureates to speak at the venue, and comedian Eugene Mirman talked about how his comedy night at the venue has been called one of the best in the city. Union Hall co-owner Jim Carden described how many Brooklyn organizations have held fundraisers at the space and detailed the many ways he and his partners have tried to address noise concerns, from soundproofing to putting up signs like the one at right to trying to hold meetings with block residents who say they’ve been disturbed by the bar’s noise. Some of those residents, who have been complaining about Union Hall for many months now, described not being able to sleep because their street is constantly filled with drunken revelers at all hours of the night and morning. Most dramatically, one Union Street resident said she’d been dealing with auto-immune problems that were directly linked to sleep deprivation. The struggle between Union Hall and its neighbors is one that’s currently being played out all around the city, and community boards have become battlegrounds where the fight between people who want to preserve their residential streets and businesses that want to operate on those streets is played out. A somewhat similar liquor license battle was recently fought over an oyster bar that’s opening on Hoyt Street. The committee’s recommendation on Union Hall will be voted on by all of Community Board 6 next week, and if the full board also backs the motion, the State Liquor Authority will have to weigh the decision when it decides on whether to renew Union Hall’s license at the end of this month.
Neighbors to Union Hall: Shut Up! [Brownstoner]
Shucks! Oyster Bar Dredges Up Controversy on Hoyt [Brownstoner]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. 1:06: Completely agree. One time I walked down that side of the street, and a plebian brushed up against my Gucci handbag. I tried to sanitize the spot where his juices touched my bag, but it was unsuccessful. I had no choice but to burn it.

    That was the same night when I saw a brown person in our idyllic, supposedly “safe” neighborhood. As you might imagine, I needed an extra therapy session that week.

  2. actually 1:08 since he’s not the the chair of a community board committee he, unfortunately, has the right to vote if you read that correctly!!!!!!!!

    does he chair this committee??????? Mr. B’s post said only that he was a member

  3. I was at the meeting. Not noted here yet was the NYPD representative’s report near the beginning of the public hearing. Of the 33 noise complaints to 311 (I think that was since Jan 1st, but I could be wrong), the majority of them were made between 11pm and 1am. Only 7 of the 33 were made after 2am. So stopping sale of alcohol at UH at midnight will not satisfy these people who are calling in to complain. And how many people made these 33 complaints? A grand total of 5 people with one person making the majority.

    UH “sign a contract” with conditions? These complainers will never be satisfied until UH is closed and they can smugly declare themselves the winners.

    One women complained she shouldn’t have to close her own window to keep out noise. I used to live on Clinton Street between Union and Sackett for numerous years. Completely residential block. No bar anywhere near. In fact back then, the nearest bar (not social club) anywhere near was the Brooklyn Inn, many blocks away. Well, my bedroom was on the street and in the summer I had to keep my window closed and put in a cheap a/c to use its white noise to keep the sounds of loud pedestrians from bothering my sleep.

    This is the CITY! It’s noisy! Always has been, always will be.

    As for people posting here that this committee’s vote last night doesn’t mean much? Sorry, it means everything. The full CB will support their vote against UH and these days the SLA rules along the lines of the CBs. UH could be in big trouble.

1 11 12 13 14 15 34