union-hall-1-05-2008.jpg
Last night Community Board 6’s landmarks/land-use committee dealt a harsh (albeit symbolic) blow to local watering hole and performance space Union Hall. After a lengthy and often rancorous public hearing about renewing the Park Slope bar and venue’s liquor license, the committee voted 6 to 2 in favor of a motion that denies Union Hall a renewal unless the business’s owners sign a contract stipulating that they will take measures to ameliorate noise, such as stopping the sale of alcohol after midnight. Although the motion is ultimately only advisory, the committee member who introduced it—Lou Sones, who himself owns a bar, The Brazen Head on Atlantic Avenue—described it as the community board’s “nuclear weapon” in terms of being a powerful indication to the State Liquor Authority that Union Hall is disturbing the lives of nearby residents. The motion was introduced after a two-hour-long pubic hearing in which many supporters of Union Hall, which is on Union Street between 5th and 6th avenues, spoke about how much they appreciated the business. A good number of residents who live near the establishment, meanwhile, described how noise from the business and its patrons was negatively affecting their quality of life. More people at the hearing, in fact, spoke out in support of Union Hall than against it. Find out what they had to say, and read the anti-UH faction’s claims, on the jump…

union-hall-2-05-2008.JPGThe business’s boosters said Union Hall is a great deal more than just a bar or rock venue. One of the people who runs the club’s Secret Science Club, for example, noted that his group has brought three Nobel Laureates to speak at the venue, and comedian Eugene Mirman talked about how his comedy night at the venue has been called one of the best in the city. Union Hall co-owner Jim Carden described how many Brooklyn organizations have held fundraisers at the space and detailed the many ways he and his partners have tried to address noise concerns, from soundproofing to putting up signs like the one at right to trying to hold meetings with block residents who say they’ve been disturbed by the bar’s noise. Some of those residents, who have been complaining about Union Hall for many months now, described not being able to sleep because their street is constantly filled with drunken revelers at all hours of the night and morning. Most dramatically, one Union Street resident said she’d been dealing with auto-immune problems that were directly linked to sleep deprivation. The struggle between Union Hall and its neighbors is one that’s currently being played out all around the city, and community boards have become battlegrounds where the fight between people who want to preserve their residential streets and businesses that want to operate on those streets is played out. A somewhat similar liquor license battle was recently fought over an oyster bar that’s opening on Hoyt Street. The committee’s recommendation on Union Hall will be voted on by all of Community Board 6 next week, and if the full board also backs the motion, the State Liquor Authority will have to weigh the decision when it decides on whether to renew Union Hall’s license at the end of this month.
Neighbors to Union Hall: Shut Up! [Brownstoner]
Shucks! Oyster Bar Dredges Up Controversy on Hoyt [Brownstoner]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Was it zoned for such? Yes. Did they get the liquor license? Yes, to both. Not much standing for all these people to complain after the fact.

    As for the ones who moved in later; they should have thought about that beforehand.

  2. Union Hall is about 100 feet (or so) off Fifth Ave., so yeah it’s on the residential block. But to punish the bar for being successful because a few yahoos speak loudly on Brownstone row is unfair, biased, and short sighted. There’s only so much Union Hall can do to control their patrons—by attempting to curtail the alcohol flow i.e., last call at midnight will not solve anything.

    Do I have a solution that’ll satisfy local residents? Nope. Well, they seem to have an answer—a completely self-serving one. Shut it down. Not in my backyard. A slippery slope, indeed. Because they have a legit argument.

  3. “Banning the sale of alcohol after midnight would make alot sense as a citywide rule.”

    Brilliant 9:12 – Then this city could finally achieve the highest aspirations of being in the same league as say Cleveland or Buffalo. Wonderful, imagine the city as vibrant and alluring as those thriving towns!

  4. Once again quality of life issues threatened by ever-so-sensitive yuppies. This is a big city that once had character and artists and a cutting edge. If people can’t stomach a bit of noise or activity in a CITY, maybe its time to consider moving to the hills where its quiet and they can live out their boring lives in peace and quiet while letting the rest of us enjoy city life.

  5. One of the anti-Union Hall people had called 911 to report overcrowding–causing a fire engine to race down Union Street with sirens blaring in the middle of the night. The fire fighters found that Union Hall was well below capacity and left without incident…WHO’S CREATING THE NOISE PROBLEM?!

1 32 33 34