36-Troy-1.jpg
The BOTD is a no-frills look at interesting structures of all types and from all neighborhoods. There will be old, new, important, forgotten, public, private, good and bad. Whatever strikes our fancy. We hope you enjoy.

Address:
36 Troy Avenue, between Atlantic and Herkimer
Name: Private House
Neighborhood: Bedford Stuyvesant
Year Built: 2005
Architectural Style: Neo- Fedders
Architects: JAJ Corporation
Landmarked: No

Why chosen: Sometimes accused of never presenting anything built later than 1935, here’s one for you: an early 21st Century row house for the middle class. I rather like this 3 family infill house. It’s the jewel in a very altered and remuddled short block of houses which are isolated from the much finer stock of nearby Stuyvesant Heights. Instead of the usual style-less infill houses, this one has some nice features. The eye is immediately drawn to the best feature of the house, the third floor, which has nicely proportioned balcony doors, with the fanlight above it, crowned with the arch and the little peaked dormer. It looks as if there may be a partial fourth floor in the rear of the house, as well. The bricks are a pleasing color and were used well, with some subtle detailing on the facade. Unfortunately, some things did not work so well. The second floor balcony and window lines are askew. I would have lined the window lines and lintels up evenly. The air conditioner near the balcony is less than attractive, as are the utility meters. Is it so hard to box meters and incorporate that into the design? But all in all, this isn’t bad, and is much better than most infill, and certainly the best looking house on the block. Too bad this company didn’t replicate this basic design more often in other parts of Bed Stuy and Bushwick, where good infill housing is needed. I’ve seen some other good modern moderate income housing in the community, and will feature them from time to time.

36-Troy-2.jpg
Photo: Googlemaps


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I was going to call it “Neo-Fedders Revival”, but it just didn’t qualify.

    The idea is to get people talking. It worked.

    Mopar, I like the Habitat building. I have to go over there and get a picture.

    I will get around to other neighborhoods as I can.

  2. Post Modern Fedder (Po Mo Fed) is more like it.

    There are plenty of examples of very handsome infill buildings constructed in the past 10 years. This is not one of them. But it is the best looking building on the block (a well-designed building would be completely out of context here).

    As to aesthetics in general, they are important to some people. And just as you are free (in most places) to put up anything you want, we are free to critique it. God bless America.

  3. I think it’s horrible in a really interesting way, Putnam. I really want to know the story behind the decision to use doors-as-windows and random decorative elements. And actually, I think it’s interesting. Someone took a bunch of stock elements from Home Depot and put them together with no sense of order (or even function) at all. Why? Don’t you wonder?

  4. Wellheythere hit it right on the head.

    Grand Pa: believe it or not, there are folks to whom aethetics are not that important. Since you mentioned the Syrian part of Gravesend, I also urge that folks visit the much more moderst western part of Gravesend, where I grew up.

    On that side, you will find formerly charming one-family Dutch Colonials that have been CONVERTED to the equivalent of Fedders by the OCCUPANT, not a developer. The lawn is cemented over to make a driveway. A one family is converted to two or three families, and the meters are placed in front.

    Who is doing this? The immigrant population that is moving into the area. Somewhat ugly? You bet. What should be done about it? Nothing. Aesthetics is not a state matter.

    I also agree: God Bless America

1 2