Building of the Day: 377 Prospect Place
The BOTD is a no-frills look at interesting structures of all types and from all neighborhoods. There will be old, new, important, forgotten, public, private, good and bad. Whatever strikes our fancy. We hope you enjoy. Address: 377 Prospect Place, between Underhill and Washington Name: Private House Neighborhood: Prospect Heights Year Built: Unknown Architectural Style:…

The BOTD is a no-frills look at interesting structures of all types and from all neighborhoods. There will be old, new, important, forgotten, public, private, good and bad. Whatever strikes our fancy. We hope you enjoy.
Address: 377 Prospect Place, between Underhill and Washington
Name: Private House
Neighborhood: Prospect Heights
Year Built: Unknown
Architectural Style: Neo-Grec, sorta kinda
Architects: Unknown
Landmarked: No
Why chosen: Here’s another is my collection of ordinary houses. They are vernacular houses built for people of modest means, usually nothing fancy, perhaps the Fedders of their day, but they still have a charm unlike the ordinary houses usually built today. This one is a stylistic jambalaya. Stoopless row houses are pretty rare in Brooklyn. This house and its neighbor are two of a kind on this mixed use residential/industrial block. Two steps up, and you are at the door, more similar to homes in Philadelphia or Baltimore, not usually Brooklyn. There Is an empty house next door, and this house has side windows, so that lot has been empty a very long time. The basic shape and materials of the houses says Greek Revival, but the decorative incised patterns on the lintels and doorway are textbook Neo-Grec. And then you have that cornice with the Mediterranean tiled roof! A roof that doesn’t extend from the top of the building, but a foot or so down. An awning, really, with great brackets. Were they added later? Part of the original design? Is the front door transom original, and what did the original door look like? Were these houses built well before the commercial buildings, are they survivors of Prospect Heights’ earlier days? So many questions for such a small and ordinary workingman’s house. Mysteries waiting to be solved.
“Finally, I don’t have to answer to you, or anybody else, as to why I visit this site.”
Absolutely right. But just out of curiosity: why DO you visit this site, when it seems to make you so angry all the time?
Benson, no one has suggested that everyone has to agree. But you frequently imply that others are the problem when in fact, it is your attitude that is always so harsh and critical. Why not bring it down a notch?
Oh for Pete’s sake!
Montrose, I asked Mr. B. to give you MORE RESOURCES so that this column can live up to its mission statement. If you want to take that as an insult, be my guest.
By the way, I live in Park Slope, one of the most covered neighborhoods on this website.
If you and others want to consider Brooklyn only to be that part developed in the 19th century, fine. I gave my opinion, for whatever it is worth.
Finally, I don’t have to answer to you, or anybody else, as to why I visit this site. If Mr. B. wants this site to turn into an echo chamber, he can filter out me and a couple of other posters, and it will be done.
Good answer.
Plus I would add Montrose has covered several modern buildings, including a few from the 1920s and more recent years.
Oooo, just got back to CONTROVERSY.
Benson, your dislike of me, personally, is showing again. If you don’t like the column, do us all a favor and skip over it, like I skip over stories about condoboxes on 4th Ave. If my choices anger you that much, you should seek professional help.
And why should Jon listen to you anyway? You never have anything good to say about his choice of topics, architecture, points of view, preservation issues, or anything else he does. You find the blog and its preservation stance morally bankrupt, the people too politically correct, everyone is anti-Italian, anti-Republican, anti-conservative, and anti-the neighborhoods you like. Why on earth do you even read Brownstoner?
Minard,
Thanks for you architectural imput.
Very interesting.
Let’s see… What would be a good name for a blog devoted to real estate in Marine Park and Gravesend?
Hi Benson. Last time I checked, this blog was called BROWNSTONER. Therefore, I think it’s completely appropriate for MM to restrict her postings to buildings in and around Brownstone Brooklyn (though perhaps she could tweak her BOTD description to make this clear).
Personally, I’m not all that interested in buildings in Marine Park or Gravesend. If I were, I’d seek out a blog devoted to those neighborhoods. I don’t think I’m the only devotee of this site who feels this way.
Perhaps you could write a column as well benson, kind of like a Point/Counterpoint thing.