377-Prospect-Pl.jpg
The BOTD is a no-frills look at interesting structures of all types and from all neighborhoods. There will be old, new, important, forgotten, public, private, good and bad. Whatever strikes our fancy. We hope you enjoy.

Address: 377 Prospect Place, between Underhill and Washington
Name: Private House
Neighborhood: Prospect Heights
Year Built: Unknown
Architectural Style: Neo-Grec, sorta kinda
Architects: Unknown
Landmarked: No

Why chosen: Here’s another is my collection of ordinary houses. They are vernacular houses built for people of modest means, usually nothing fancy, perhaps the Fedders of their day, but they still have a charm unlike the ordinary houses usually built today. This one is a stylistic jambalaya. Stoopless row houses are pretty rare in Brooklyn. This house and its neighbor are two of a kind on this mixed use residential/industrial block. Two steps up, and you are at the door, more similar to homes in Philadelphia or Baltimore, not usually Brooklyn. There Is an empty house next door, and this house has side windows, so that lot has been empty a very long time. The basic shape and materials of the houses says Greek Revival, but the decorative incised patterns on the lintels and doorway are textbook Neo-Grec. And then you have that cornice with the Mediterranean tiled roof! A roof that doesn’t extend from the top of the building, but a foot or so down. An awning, really, with great brackets. Were they added later? Part of the original design? Is the front door transom original, and what did the original door look like? Were these houses built well before the commercial buildings, are they survivors of Prospect Heights’ earlier days? So many questions for such a small and ordinary workingman’s house. Mysteries waiting to be solved.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. just to throw petrol on the fire, we used to have a fun Friday horror show thread (some of Babs’s links could do well there) Wasn’t it Benson’s political correctness against snarkiness that sunk?

  2. Yes you are, benson. There are plenty of other websites where your comments would be appreciated. I think Sara Palin’ facebook page…or Ann Coulter’s. Oh wait- definitely Rush Limbaugh. By all means come out swinging and then whine when you get called on it.

    You don’t get it- you are so transparent. If you were any more jealous of MM your skin would turn acid green. That and a huge martyr complex – Once again- if you don’t like it here, form your own damn blog instead of bitching and moaning on this one.

  3. Babs;

    Your most recent post above would be my response to Park Sloper’s query above.

    Did I say that Mr. B. should feature McMansion’s? I said he should feature homes from other areas.

    Your response, however, is typical of the type of “dialogue” that passes for commentary here. You go through the internet and show extreme examples. Yes, you’re right, these homes are typical of what one sees there. Happy that you made your “point”?

    It’s typical of the type of “dialogue” one sees on a cableTV foodfight. Pick out the extremes, use them to call the other side racist or a bigot, or a philistine or ignorant. It’s so tiresome.

    PS is right. I’m wasting my time here.

  4. “Finally, I don’t have to answer to you, or anybody else, as to why I visit this site. If Mr. B. wants this site to turn into an echo chamber, he can filter out me and a couple of other posters, and it will be done.”

    I didn’t say you had to answer to me. As per usual, you’ve taken into the realm of the personal affront to your aggrieved presense.

    Have a good evening.

1 2 3 4