Only the Blog Knows Brooklyn reflects on the push-and-pull process by which development occurs throughout the borough and ends up sounding, dare we say, optimistic. Ah, idealism.
develop

Brooklyn is having a moment the likes of which I haven’t seen since I moved here in 1991. All of a sudden it’s the it-borough: Manhattan is expanding eastward and the land grab of 2005 is a veritible gold rush. But there’s also a whole lot of shoutin’ going on. People are organizing and blogging and demonstrating and talking and petitioning and yelling and writing and speech making and thinking and…You get the idea. This is fighting the good fight Brooklyn style. And like Brooklyn, it’s smart and scrappy, down to earth, spunky and ambitious. It’s gotta be. Development on this scale represents big money, big politics, big corporations, and in some cases, big bad guys. It’s a tough fight to fight. But with the help of the activists, the urban historians, the humanistic theorists, the gurus of smart development, maybe, just maybe, some visionary plans can get generated and put to the test.

Postcard from The Slope: Loud [OTBKB]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I have no desire to get in the middle of this debate, but I just thought I would throw out one thought. I love the brownstone neighborhoods of Brooklyn, and I hope they are not destroyed, but one inherent danger in mainting the low-rise character of Brooklyn that people fail to mention is that when you create historic districts with height restrictions on new development, you essentially create an enclave for the very wealthy to live. It doesn’t happen overnight, but it does happen. The West Village, Brooklyn Heights, and Cobble Hill are all prime examples, as well as central Paris (since you brought that city up).

    Not that I don’t think we should preserve these histroric neighborhoods, but I think this side-effect is not often mentioned.

  2. You said
    Just because someone lives closer to development site doesn’t give them a veto.

    What do you mean? That’s something it could expect to hear in communist dictatorship country. Not in democracy.
    Of course it does.

    You said
    There are plenty of examples of high-rise bldgs throughout boro – think all the new downtown office bldgs, starrett city, mitchel-lama coops

    Yes and they are so great and amazing architectural creation I can not wait to have them more. !!!!

  3. You said:

    1st of all the barrier between PH and FG is ATLANTIC AVE (6 lanes of major fast moving traffic) so no matter what you build they will now and always be separated.

    Unlike the BQE, Atlantic Ave can be crossed. It is actually has traffic lights. Development could help to bridge traffic on Atlantic, but what I’ve seen isn’t promising. There was nothing in the Gehry design that facilitates it. On the contrary, he does not even bother to continue the streets coming down from Fort Greene. (Nets station…. Please it will be as charming as Madison Square Garden vicinity. You sound like someone who has something to do with urban planning–you should know that stadiums do not create a vibrant urban community).

    You said:

    Actually NO – Williamsburg Savings Bank is far taller than 6 stories and you know what – it is beautiful

    You are absolutely right it is a gorgeous building but part of its charm is based on the fact that it is a single dominant amid the surrounding neighborhoods. It is a counterpoint and it works it has a clock and all people in the hood knows what time it is. It is unique one of its kind. As the Eiffel tower dominates Paris, so the clock tower dominates Fort Greene. Now imagine dozens of buildings like this one from Atlantic center are right next to it!!!!!

    You said:

    (quoting me:) “And most of Brooklyn is historically low (except of dumbo, downtown Brooklyn) and this is her beauty.” Says who???? Anti-development folks who have jobs or who “freelance” and don’t care about maintaining a sustainable economy for ALL of Brooklyn’s residents?

    Well just look around most of Brooklyn is low. And I am not anti-development. I like development and good appropriate architecture—why not think it through and do it well?

    You said:

    Maybe people haven’t noticed but Atlantic and Flatbush is THAT center – what Williamsburg Savings Bank represents is the last bit of appropriate development prior to the destruction brought on by the suburbanization of America (and the almost destruction of the city). I for one am glad that appropriate development may once again begin in the great city of Brooklyn!

    Atlantic is a natural commercial core for Brooklyn and needs to be developed, absolutely. We would like to create a thriving neighborhood – that’s what Brooklyn is about. It is not suburbia—nor should it be treated like downtown LA.

  4. I don’t know about any great city of Brooklyn –
    but as far as NYC is concerned – and we have to
    think of the whole city first – not Prospect Hts
    nor boro of Bklyn – whether this is good. Just because someone lives closer to development site doesn’t give them a veto.
    So as far as New York City (think about 8 million poeple not just the few thousand nearby) goes – this area is a major transportation hub and looking to financial
    future of this city – is prime for large-scale development.
    There are plenty of examples of high-rise bldgs throughout boro – think all the new downtown office bldgs, starrett city, mitchel-lama coops
    and rentals.
    A good debate is what taxpayer finances will go into this and what is overall taxpayer benefit long term. I don’t know that answer – but all I seem to hear is from the one corner is fight this no matter what….
    Ever hear the term CAVE people – Citizens Against
    Virtully Anything — I think their are plenty
    around us.

  5. I agree there is no manufacture industry and it needed to be replaced by office space, and Atlantic yards are good place to develop. Would it be nice if there would be some mix of office/retail/living space balanced with green space? Would it be nice if all of this would be lower than 6 floors so it would be actually nice to be there (human scale).
    As oppose to Battery Park city or midtown hi rise architecture. And most of Brooklyn is historically low (except of dumbo, downtown Brooklyn) and this is her beauty.
    Problem is that I have seen this project for Atlantic yard and it is way to massive it is a sort of the barrier between two hoods (PH and FG)
    Just take a look at this website, it is way out of scale!!!!!
    http://www.bball.net/
    What we need is something that will connect hoods not separate.
    Whole nets arena is there only for two reason to please major Markowitz ( he wants to be the one who brings back professional sport to B ) and to grab public money (my and yours taxes) in order to finance private business (condo sells).
    I just can not believe what is happening and why some people are for this project.
    After Atlantic center Ratner should be banned from Brooklyn it is architectural disaster (it is ugly as hell it could be ok in suburbs on New Jersey maybe). Pulse thinks like Carlton street disaster (different developer) I just can not see anything good coming in Atlantic Yard.

    It really can be done in Better Brooklyn way. It can be done Just look at State street development
    http://www.14townhouses.com./main.html

  6. Yes Indeed it is very idealistic approach specially that part about Developers walking and learning from neighborhoods somehow I am can not picture Ratner doing that.
    Really great approach is to fight them with zoning adjustments like FGA and CHS is trying to do. It will prevent Carlton street disaster from happening again.
    http://www.historicfortgreene.org/r6b.html
    Unfortunately this zoning change will not save us from Trump ghetto in Atlantic yards.
    There is no doubt that Atlantic Yards should be develop but in more civilize way.
    Big question is what we can really do to make sure that Brooklyn will stay low.