Residential Sales in Brooklyn
FORT GREENE $1.35 million 421 Clermont Avenue GMAP 3,288-square-foot, 3-family, 19th century landmark townhouse on a 22-by-100-foot lot. The property last sold for $500,000 in 2003, according to public records. PARK SLOPE $1.05 million 378 12th Street GMAP 1,205-sq.-ft., 2-bedroom, 2-bathnew townhouse condo; eat-in kitchen, oversize windows, h/w floors, washer/dryer, c/a, north and west exposures;…
FORT GREENE $1.35 million
421 Clermont Avenue GMAP
3,288-square-foot, 3-family, 19th century landmark townhouse on a 22-by-100-foot lot. The property last sold for $500,000 in 2003, according to public records.
PARK SLOPE $1.05 million
378 12th Street GMAP
1,205-sq.-ft., 2-bedroom, 2-bathnew townhouse condo; eat-in kitchen, oversize windows, h/w floors, washer/dryer, c/a, north and west exposures; common charges $175; taxes $1,572 (abated); listed at $949,000; on market 19 weeks. Broker: Corcoran Group.
Second item from the New York Times, Residential Sales Around the Region.
Photo of 421 Clermont by Sarah Westcott for Property Shark.
7:13 here,
True…I looked at the link as well and didn’t see the FG listing. That’s why I wrote “per Brownstoner”…wanted to lay the blame…but maybe it was off a previous listing?…benefit of the doubt. Seems the researcher on this thread confirmed some of the money picture on this property.
Right, but when I look on the link – all that I see is the Park Slope referenced apartment, not the Fort Greene referenced brownstone.
No you’re not losing your mind…it’s just been a long day.
The source for the info (residential sales) is off the NYTimes Residential Sales in the Region page per Brownstoner.
Am I losing my mind? Where does the Times say anything about the Fort Greene place?
6:04,
5:10 here. I agree with you in part. Still, the NYTimes’ failed to see that the “sale” price did not represent a straight sale but carried a debt that the new owner assumed. That IS part of the transaction. I guess it’s just not something that is disclosed and easy to obtain from whatever sources they use…or course, they should always factcheck what they put out there.
Speaking of WMD…the NYTimes wasn’t too great on that one either and doesn’t compare in any way to the actual cost of a house in FG… Sad…in fact, the Times was integral to justification based on false information.
Hhhh…
you really think the NYTimes is responsible for researching the thousands of real estate listing on their site??
maybe you should channel some of that energy into seeing that our president is responsible for his research on wmd’s instead.
So thanks to the NYTimes’ lousy reporting, lack of research, they managed to put it out there that a 4-story in FG with a 100′ deep lot went for 1.35 when a little research shows there is at least another 600K involved.
HHhhhh!
That’s her.
If she is who I am thinking of, I believe she grew up in the building and used to own it.