houseFort Greene
31 South Oxford Street
Corcoran
Sunday 3-4
$1,969,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseClinton Hill
147 St. James Place
Two Trees
Sunday 12-1:30
$1,950,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseBedford Stuyvesant
243 Stuyvesant Avenue
Brooklyn Properties
Sunday 2-3
$950,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseCrown Heights
1244 Union Street
Prospective Properties
Sunday 12-1
$550,000
GMAP P*Shark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Ok. Who is selling this the owner, the 15 real estate brokers who have signs in the window. I don’t get it. the house is nice but the broker told me I could get 4000 in rent. The owner tells me he is the broker and the owner and he has 1.9 on the table. Which way is up with this place. Ft. Greene is changing prices have to come down..

  2. DIBS, I’ll be the first to concede that different neighborhoods (and blocks, and buildings, etc) hit the plateau at different times. Bed Stuy and (somehow) Carroll Gardens continued to appreciate past 2004… other neighborhoods did not.

    In fact the reason I noticed this is that by 2005 or so the value of my apartment had just about tripled, and I started to think about cashing in and moving to Carroll Gardens. But as I thought about it, and continued to think about it (it’s not a decision I can make quickly), I became completely priced out of Carroll Gardens, while comps in my building did not move an inch (seriously).

    Now I have no idea what do do. I might still cash out, to get peak price. Then maybe look in PLG or Kensington or somewhere. Or maybe rent for a while.

    (Nothing wrong with buying at peak, by the way – as long as you can afford a place, and you love it, and you stay for a while, that’s just fine.)

  3. “For $550K, you’re lucky if the house is clean for the showing, let alone the photo shoot.”

    When we sold our PS coop for $600K a couple years ago I scrubbed the place for our broker and kept cleaning it constantly while we were selling it. Cleared every single piece of clutter on every surface for photos, and again for open houses and even for every single private showing we had. Bought flowers for photos and continually throughout the time we had the place on the market. Flowers are a minimal investment. $10 for some hydrangeas or roses at the flower market on 7th Ave next to the supermarket. I never see any reason for showing your place looking dirty and gross no matter what the price. It’s just lazy. And imagine what the apartment looked like while the people were living there, if it’s filthy while they’re trying to sell it. Consciously or unconsciously buyers will think there’ll be mice and roaches if they move in there.

  4. Can anyone report back on the S. Oxford house? We are really curious about it since we would consider moving to that area and the size/layout seems good for us – but we are also very suspicious about lack of interior photos. We can’t make the open house, so hearing from others who do make it would be helpful…

  5. Montrose,
    I agree. You don’t have to be Ada Louise Huxtable to know that a classical style limestone rowhouse in Brooklyn could not have been built in 1930. It makes the realtors look ignorant about buildings, which is supposed to be their trade. More than ignorant, stupid and uncaring.

  6. My sensitivity is triggered by photos so dark, you can’t tell what kind of room you’re looking at. How can anyone expect to get a positive reaction from that? You are very funny, dittoburg.

    Pet peeve – I know all real estate agents aren’t historians, but surely, as people presumably living in New York City, they should know that this limestone was not built, in 1930. I know that is probably what is erroneously listed in ACRIS, but that doesn’t even make sense. I would have gone with a general “turn of the century”.

1 2 3