Open House Picks
Park Slope 865 Union Street Townsley & Gay Sunday 1:30-3:30 $2,550,000 GMAP P*Shark Park Slope 303 13th Street Warren Lewis Sunday 2:30-5 $1,895,000 GMAP P*Shark Ditmas Park 440 East 19th Street Mary Kay Gallagher Sunday 1-3 $1,390,000 GMAP P*Shark Prospect Lefferts Gardens 73 Rutland Road Corcoran Sunday 12-2:30 $1,390,000 GMAP P*Shark
Park Slope
865 Union Street
Townsley & Gay
Sunday 1:30-3:30
$2,550,000
GMAP P*Shark
Park Slope
303 13th Street
Warren Lewis
Sunday 2:30-5
$1,895,000
GMAP P*Shark
Ditmas Park
440 East 19th Street
Mary Kay Gallagher
Sunday 1-3
$1,390,000
GMAP P*Shark
Prospect Lefferts Gardens
73 Rutland Road
Corcoran
Sunday 12-2:30
$1,390,000
GMAP P*Shark
Brownstoner what about the 6 months follow up on HOTD? Many of us appreciated it.
3:50, the point is this annoying spammer has already made the point 100 times in the last two days. We get it and I assume Brownstoner is trying to figure something out unless Brownstoner wants to continue losing people and interest, which, I agree with Jerri, is happining daily as a result of all the server issues.
(I actually don’t even believe this spammer is the original poster to put up the comment, but rather some jerk with nothing better to do than try to f*** up this site)
While I don’t approve of the spammers tactics, s/he makes a valid point. Brownstoner is one of several real estate blogs I frequent. When I’ve been reading one of the others and the switch over to Brownstoner, it’s tough sometimes. I actually moved a lamp right next to my monitor which seems to help reduce eyestrain. Still, it is a pain and I wish the spammer would be nicer so that the issue could receive a fair hearing.
I also like the Rutland Road house. not cart wheeling over it though. seems to be missing excitement, even the new kitchen. in my opinion, the cabinets are already dated. also, the dark mill work could use a face lift to help the house pop. the bathroom is lovely. i think the price is right at least for this market but i could have sworn this house was advertised a few weeks ago for 1.345.
anybody know about the Rutland beauty a few doors away that’s in contract? oh, and the Midwood Street house is also in contract. did they get their price?
I’m going to have to check into bloghab. I’m getting way too worked up and angry over the fact that half my posts never show up, other peoples seem to double post, and the blind spammer has completely undercut his reasonable point by repetitively posting it.
I have to say that between the spammers, the What and the inability to post comments 7 times out of 10, this site has taken a bit of a downward spiral over the past couple weeks.
The quality of the site is suffering, and I’m finding myself spending much less time here.
The fact that the real estate market is tanking now means the site needs to be even higher quality in my opinion, because people (including myself) are becoming less and less interested in real estate right now.
If you want to continue this wonderful website, I think it would be nice to spend some time on bringing the quality level back to what it used to be.
All these commenting problems, spam and profanity are taking their toll on my interest in reading very often.
brownstoner can you not block the idiot who is spamming your site
Brenda is a mad fool, yo.
At least 95% of the posts on this site are from people who’re logged in as “guest”. This means that someone reading the comments on this site will be reading almost everything in faded type. Now, I understand why the faded type is used for “guests”. However, in my opinion it’s not worth it.
The faded type is clearly legible, but over the long haul it is more fatigue-inducing than regular, darker type. So, Mr. B, do you really want to condemn your readership to slogging through so much faded type?
Just a thought. Again, I do understand why the faded type was introduced. I just don’t think it’s worth it. You’re shooting yourself in the foot (and inducing eyestrain in your readers) as things currently stand.
At least 95% of the posts on this site are from people who’re logged in as “guest”. This means that someone reading the comments on this site will be reading almost everything in faded type. Now, I understand why the faded type is used for “guests”. However, in my opinion it’s not worth it.
The faded type is clearly legible, but over the long haul it is more fatigue-inducing than regular, darker type. So, Mr. B, do you really want to condemn your readership to slogging through so much faded type?
Just a thought. Again, I do understand why the faded type was introduced. I just don’t think it’s worth it. You’re shooting yourself in the foot (and inducing eyestrain in your readers) as things currently stand.
At least 95% of the posts on this site are from people who’re logged in as “guest”. This means that someone reading the comments on this site will be reading almost everything in faded type. Now, I understand why the faded type is used for “guests”. However, in my opinion it’s not worth it.
The faded type is clearly legible, but over the long haul it is more fatigue-inducing than regular, darker type. So, Mr. B, do you really want to condemn your readership to slogging through so much faded type?
Just a thought. Again, I do understand why the faded type was introduced. I just don’t think it’s worth it. You’re shooting yourself in the foot (and inducing eyestrain in your readers) as things currently stand.
At least 95% of the posts on this site are from people who’re logged in as “guest”. This means that someone reading the comments on this site will be reading almost everything in faded type. Now, I understand why the faded type is used for “guests”. However, in my opinion it’s not worth it.
The faded type is clearly legible, but over the long haul it is more fatigue-inducing than regular, darker type. So, Mr. B, do you really want to condemn your readership to slogging through so much faded type?
Just a thought. Again, I do understand why the faded type was introduced. I just don’t think it’s worth it. You’re shooting yourself in the foot (and inducing eyestrain in your readers) as things currently stand.
At least 95% of the posts on this site are from people who’re logged in as “guest”. This means that someone reading the comments on this site will be reading almost everything in faded type. Now, I understand why the faded type is used for “guests”. However, in my opinion it’s not worth it.
The faded type is clearly legible, but over the long haul it is more fatigue-inducing than regular, darker type. So, Mr. B, do you really want to condemn your readership to slogging through so much faded type?
Just a thought. Again, I do understand why the faded type was introduced. I just don’t think it’s worth it. You’re shooting yourself in the foot (and inducing eyestrain in your readers) as things currently stand.
At least 95% of the posts on this site are from people who’re logged in as “guest”. This means that someone reading the comments on this site will be reading almost everything in faded type. Now, I understand why the faded type is used for “guests”. However, in my opinion it’s not worth it.
The faded type is clearly legible, but over the long haul it is more fatigue-inducing than regular, darker type. So, Mr. B, do you really want to condemn your readership to slogging through so much faded type?
Just a thought. Again, I do understand why the faded type was introduced. I just don’t think it’s worth it. You’re shooting yourself in the foot (and inducing eyestrain in your readers) as things currently stand.