houseCarroll Gardens
391 Union Street
Halstead
Sunday 1-3
$2,200,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseProspect Lefferts Gardens
66 Midwood Street
Corcoran
Sunday 12-1:30
$1,400,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseWindsor Terrace
619 Greenwood Avenue
Warren Lewis
Sunday 12-2
$985,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseBedford Stuyvesant
305 Stuyvesant Avenue
Corcoran
Sunday 2-3
$695,000
GMAP P*Shark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. 3:57:

    Gabby posted an article today about a new Tibetan Store opening in the old Shoe Store on 7th and Lincoln in Park Slope.

    The problem was…that Shoe Store closed early in the fall, and the Tibetan store opened as a holiday only store (in November or early December) and just CLOSED this past Monday. It was open for about 2 months, and had a for rent sign in the window during the entire time it was open because it was just a temporary store. Anyone who knows anything about Park Slope store goings on or cared to ask someone would have known that.

    Not very good reporting, if you ask me. Especially for someone who gets paid to cover Park Slope.

    So now the entire article and thread has been removed.

    Just deleted 10 minutes ago. As if it never existed.

    Clearly this girl doesn’t walk up and down 7th and 5th Avenues very much.

  2. Sorry–I didn’t see that 3:36’s post was an answer to 3:12 question about the subway.

    To expand a bit on his/her answer, the subway is sunken. Only Lincoln Road and Parkside Ave go through, on bridges over the subway cut.

  3. The Midwood house is on a great block. There are many dinner parties happening on that block. BTW, 52 Midwood sold for 1.665, not 1.6.

    The Lincoln Road entrance to the park is very convenient for this location. Two blocks up, one and a half over.

  4. So instead of correcting the post on the Park Slope Tibetan Store, you delete it off the website?

    Too good to admit you made a mistake???

    I’m so over this website.

    It has gone to complete shit.

  5. rjlovie,

    AFAIK extended family use is not considered a violation of the LM single family covenant. However, Lefferts Manor is also zoned R2 which might impact on how separate an in-law’s suite could be. I’m no zoning expert, so I really don’t know.

    3:11,

    I could see how the single family status of LM houses might, in theory, reduce the value [although LM houses, so far, have usually commanded a premium over most of the rest of PLG]. Even if the single family LM houses’ values WERE reduced I’d hardly call that a negative. There’s a lot to be said for the positive effect on our quality of life brought about by lower density–and I write that even at the risk of Polemicist once again calling me selfish:-)

1 13 14 15 16 17 19