House of the Day: 274 Lafayette Avenue
This may be a first: Creating a name for the purpose of marketing a one-family brownstone! In this case, the four-story brownstone at 274 Lafayette Avenue has been christened “Indulge” for the express purpose of selling the house for a cool $2,325,000. The house, which was purchased in 2004 for $998,000, has undergone an extensive—and…
This may be a first: Creating a name for the purpose of marketing a one-family brownstone! In this case, the four-story brownstone at 274 Lafayette Avenue has been christened “Indulge” for the express purpose of selling the house for a cool $2,325,000. The house, which was purchased in 2004 for $998,000, has undergone an extensive—and quite attractive—renovation in the meantime. It’s also got some direct competition up the road at 298 Lafayette Avenue where another recently renovated four-story brownstone is on the market for $1,995,000.
274 Lafayette Avenue [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark
nice day in the markets. just the recipe needed to think about buying a 2 mill brownstone. the 2 mill crowd are losing a lot of their spare liquidity right now. the dow has broken some key supports. look for it to trade a lot lower going into the end of the year. sell immediately your brownstone if you are thinking about it before you miss the bid of the last great real estate bubble.
dave has never been outta da hood, except to go to Newark once, that’s what he knows of NJ.
what is up with that HUGE hideous kitchen island. This whole kitchen island thing has just become totally out of control.
re 4:33, 3:49.
15 years ago you could buy that house for under $100k 4:33
you cannot buy anything other than a very small townhouse in a bad neighborhood of Philadelphia for $200k.
floorplan is up on the website now
1) 15 years ago this was very close to a couple of crack houses, and you could buy the place for around $200k.
2) You could buy the same size/shape/niceness place in Philadelphia, Baltimore, or Allentown for $200k today or less.
Brooklyn has peaked.
which analysis 4:29??
Dave your analysis is wrong, as usual. But always consistently boosterish.