House of the Day: 58 Irving Place
Listed last week at $1,350,000, 58 Irving Place must be the cheapest house that hasn’t been ruined by a flipper in Clinton Hill right now. Is it a bargain? Who knows in this market. It is a cute place that, while not fancy (nor on the best block), appears to be have retained most of…
Listed last week at $1,350,000, 58 Irving Place must be the cheapest house that hasn’t been ruined by a flipper in Clinton Hill right now. Is it a bargain? Who knows in this market. It is a cute place that, while not fancy (nor on the best block), appears to be have retained most of its original character and to be in move-in condition. The two-family is configured currently as a double-duplex but can be delivered vacant, according to the listing. Think they’ll get their price?
58 Irving Place [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark
Is this block named after Washington Irving?
1.35 is steep, but not far off the mark. 46A Irving Place sold for $841,000 and 52 Irving Place sold for 760,000 and they are only 15 ft wide…20ft x 40ft is not tiny.
1.35 is steep, but not far off the mark. 46A Irving Place sold for $841,000 and 52 Irving Place sold for 760,000 and they are only 15 ft wide…20ft x 40ft is not tiny.
[Enter The What, stage left]
Number of comments on this site going down. I guess the economic melt-down can’t be good for the real estate internet chit-chat business either. Need a pristine listing in Park Slope to make everyone jealous to juke the comment stats.
4:41 = tool
3:39 = Brownstoner
Brownstoner = lazy
3:39 — This whole blog is about Brownstoner providing information for discussion. The current rent is important information. What if he just posted a picture of the house, no location, and the asking price. Would you suggest everyone call the broker to find the location? Just as the location is important information, so is the current rent. That’s why he should provide it.
how is 20×40 tiny? that is on the larger side of brownstone proportions. this is a good deal.