255-Eastern-Parkway-0708.jpg
We’re so bullish about Eastern Parkway in the long-term that we won’t make too much of the fact that this 1,438-square-foot apartment at 255 Eastern Parkway, which sold for $216,313 in 2003, is now on the market for $825,000. To be fair, that’s not a straight-up four-bagger; the three-bedroom place has gotten what appears to be a top-notch renovation in the meantime. The only thing we can find to complain about is the choice of kitchen counter top surface. The combined monthly charges are a very reasonable $836. There was an open house yesterday. Anyone go?
255 Eastern Parkway [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. 11217, are you sure that is not high for a condo, as opposed to a co-op? I think it is, especially in CH.
    And your claim that you will pay more to rent a similar place than to own this is dubious at best.
    You are assuming that it will cost you less than about $3K (rent minus the common costs) to finance this place, plus put 20% down in cash that could be earning money for you.
    Not going to happen, even with the tax break for the mortgage.

  2. Househunt said: “There are comparably sized apartments in Carroll Gardens and Cobble Hill that cost the same per sq ft.”

    That’s crazy talk.

    Find me a listing, please. If there were any 1,450 sf 3 br/2ba apts. in those neighborhoods for 825k in the last 4 years, I must have missed them. And I was looking pretty closely.

  3. Ontheparkway- I honestly don’t know the owner/occupant ratio for the building although I believe that many original renters bought when it was coverted and still live there; this is only from what I’ve gleaned in passing conversation w/ the owner.

  4. househunt,
    I’m not sure why you think the common areas are not well-maintained. I know this building well and it is gorgeous and very clean inside. The gardens are immaculate.

    pclem: I wonder if you witnessed my husband’s mugging in early April? It was near the S overpass on EP.

  5. No, it doesn’t have to need spelled out any more than you already did. He’s talking about those with a certain amount of money, not their race.I’m not oblivious to Polemicist’s previous controversial comments. But I’ve read your comments before plenty of times too, and I maintain your comment says something about you, not him. You are the one inserting race.

  6. dittoburg, guess things have to be spelled more clearly:

    “read: upper-class whites” was a comment on Polemicist’s rant, indicating MY opinion that THAT was where HIS sensibilities lay.

    No way can one read anything about my anti- (or pro-) white feelings into that.

  7. Pclem, but the farmer’s market is just down the way, the brooklyn museum is right there, and the great botanical gardens (free on weds?) are a stone’s throw. If you are diurnal you should be ok.

1 2 3 4 5 7