BSRC-5.jpg

Read Part 1, Part 3 and Part 4 of this story.

The word ghetto was originally of Italian origin, referring to the segregated Jewish area of medieval Venice. During the Holocaust, the word came to mean the rundown, walled-in sections of cities like Warsaw and Lodz, where the Jews were confined and controlled, before they were taken away to concentration camps.

Today, the word ghetto means any urban area where poor minorities are concentrated, areas with high crime rates, poverty and substandard living conditions. These definitions are all important, because up until recently, the word ghetto was synonymous with Bedford Stuyvesant.

In researching this story, I was amazed how often the entire neighborhood of Bedford Stuyvesant was referred to by newspapers and journals as the largest ghetto in America. And that was by people who were sympathetic to Bed Stuy’s problems.

Even more famous (or infamous) for its ghetto-ness than Harlem, the most famous black community in America, Bedford Stuyvesant, in the eyes of the media, and the establishment, was the ghetto’s ghetto.

After the Great Depression, the city had basically let Bedford Stuyvesant go. World War II brought thousands into the community to work at the Navy Yard and other wartime industries, but when the war was over, and these plants shut down, there was nothing to replace them.

Even the most conservative of studies agree that the city provided no public services to the area, offered no help in employment opportunities, and barely addressed the problems of crime or poverty. Brooklyn in the 1950s and ’60s was highly segregated, with blacks and other minorities unable to move into many neighborhoods.

Bed Stuy Brooklyn Sheffield Bottling Plant
Photo via BSRC archives. Sheffield Bottling Plant in 1967, closed up. Notice the loading bays in the front.

Fair housing statutes on the books were not enforced, and real estate brokers refused to show blacks homes in certain areas, steering them to central Brooklyn. Bed Stuy was one of the few neighborhoods that African Americans could buy in, redlined and all. The ghettoization of the neighborhood was almost complete: isolation by segregation, cessation of basic services, rampant unemployment, and people trapped by poverty, crime and the inability to rise out of it.

One hot day in July of 1964, an Irish-American police lieutenant shot and killed a 15-year-old black teenager in Harlem, after an incident with a knife. This death set off riots that spread through Harlem, and directly to Bedford Stuyvesant, where rioters looted stores and destroyed property. Hundreds were arrested, and order restored, but the neighborhood had reached the crisis point.

When Robert Kennedy was elected New York’s Senator in 1964, he was presented with this urban crisis, and he knew that something must be done. Throwing money at the problem would not solve anything. A new approach was needed.

His 1966 tour of Bedford Stuyvesant was an eye opener. Bed Stuy was not Harlem. Fifteen percent of its people were homeowners, compared to 2 percent In Harlem.

In America’s largest ghetto there were institutions, like churches and Masonic lodges, that provided stability and support for many in the community, and strong block associations of committed homeowners who had sacrificed much to buy their homes, some practically living in SROs in order to pay the mortgage.

Yet, there were also block after block of burned out buildings, brownstones and tenements in horrific shape with tenants, failing schools, unemployment, people with few skills, and zero federal aid had been spent in the neighborhood. Bed Stuy, which covers a large area of central Brooklyn, had been subdivided into five different gerrymandered congressional districts, none of which had African-American representatives.

It took a lawsuit filed under the Voting Rights Act, in 1965, to force the creation of the 12th Congressional District, resulting in Shirley Chisholm being elected as America’s first black United States Congresswoman.

Kennedy was shown all of this by neighborhood activists, led by State Supreme Court Judge Thomas R. Jones and Ms. Elsie Richardson, a leader of the Central Brooklyn Coordinating Council, which had arranged the tour. Both of them voiced the concerns of the community.

“I am weary of study,” Senator, Judge Jones was quoted as saying. “Weary of speeches, weary of promises that aren’t kept. The Negro people are angry, Senator, and, judge that I am, I’m angry too. No one is helping us. Ms Richardson also expressed concern, asking Kennedy to go beyond what previous visiting officials had done.”

Other activists told Kennedy, “You’re another white guy that’s out here for the day. You’ll be gone and you’ll never be seen again, and that’s that. We’ve had enough of that.”

Kennedy left the meeting feeling overwhelmed and a bit besieged and blamed for situations he did not create, but also left determined to do something. The same old, same old would not work again. What was needed in Bedford Stuyvesant was so great, and so multifaceted, that an entirely new kind of program was needed, one that involved not just federal funds, but also community participation and opportunities, and financial help and practical ideas from the private sector.

He went to the major foundations and enlisted their help. McGeorge Bundy of the Ford Foundation, Vincent Astor at the Astor Foundation, and the Taconic Fund, which had helped him when he was attorney general, by aiding in southern voter registration. Kennedy went to private industry’s big dogs; Thomas Watson at IBM, William Paley at CBS, and leaders of Welch’s Grape Juice, Equitable Life Insurance, National City Bank, and Lazard Frares.

He recruited Republican businessmen and leaders, including John Lindsay, Kenneth Keating and Benno Schmidt, as well as his senatorial partner, Jacob Javits. Kennedy and Javits worked to secure an amendment to the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, which allowed for federal funding of community development projects in urban poverty areas, a provision that became law in 1966.

Ten months after his tour of Bed Stuy, Robert Kennedy, along with Mayor Lindsay and Senator Javits, met with a thousand or so people in a Bed Stuy school. There he announced the creation of the Bedford Stuyvesant Development and Service Corporation.

The two separate corporations within this organization would consist of one community corporation to decide what was needed, and another business corporation of business leaders and managers who would bring in the money and the expertise needed for success. The program for the development of Bedford Stuyvesant will combine the best of community action with the best of the private enterprise system, said Kennedy at the meeting. Neither by itself is enough, but in their combination lies our hope for the future.

Franklin Thomas, a black lawyer, was the first head of the community group, called the Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation (BSRC). His counterpart in the Development and Services Corporation (R&S) was John Doer, formerly of the U.S. Justice Department. In 1967, the BSRC bought an entire square block of buildings on the south side of Fulton Street, between New York and Brooklyn Avenues.

Bed Stuy Brooklyn Restoration Plaza
Photo via Forgotten NY. Shows the brownstone factory wall that made up the entrance to Restoration Plaza. This has been torn down in the recent redesign.

On that block were industrial and retail buildings, including the Sheffield Bottling Plant, once the largest employer in the area, abandoned since it closed in the early 1960’s. The plant became the main building in Restoration Plaza, housing the BSRC offices, as well as a community center and auditorium.

The entire square block of buildings was transformed by the architectural firm of Arthur Cotton and Associates, creating a ring of buildings with public space in the center, with a skating rink, and multi-level gathering spaces.

Over the next seven years, many changes would take place to this complex. The front facade of a brownstone factory was saved, and incorporated into the new buildings, and the bottling plant became home to the Billy Holiday Theater, a fully equipped stage theater, a top floor art gallery and event space, and rooms for community board meetings, as well as office space and a branch of a local college.

Because the needs of a poorer community often involve paying utility bills in person, with cash or money orders, Restoration also had branch offices of New York Telephone, Con Edison and Brooklyn Union Gas. Citibank, Manufacturers Hanover and Chase Bank all followed, opening on the Fulton Street side of the complex. Ironically, all of these banks participated in the redlining of the area.

A day care center opened, as did a Caribbean radio station. Other retail stores moved in, as well as governmental offices, such as Social Security. And perhaps, most importantly to the community, a large Pathmark supermarket opened in Restoration Plaza, the first new supermarket to open in Bedford Stuyvesant in over 30 years. By 1975, Restoration Plaza stood as the hallmark of the success of the Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Center.

But Restoration Plaza itself was not the only program initiated by the Special Impact Program. Housing, employment, quality of life issues, and the building of a better, safer, and more economically viable community were the lofty goals of the BSRC and their business partners. How many of these goals were actually met, and how many fell over the cliff? Read on to Part 3 for what came next.

Related Stories
Suzanne Spellen, aka Montrose Morris, Is Writing Brownstoner’s First Book
Saving Bedford Stuyvesant, Part 1
Saving Bedford Stuyvesant, Part 3

Email tips@brownstoner.com with further comments, questions or tips. Follow Brownstoner on Twitter and Instagram, and like us on Facebook.

[sc:mailchimp-books ]

What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Just another note regarding NYCHA. The face of NYCHA residents changed from working families when the federal government (Richard Nixon)instituted a policy in which families would have to contribute 30% of their income towards rent. At that time, the amount would equal a mortgage payment for a modest home. Many families pursued the american dream and moved on up and out.

  2. By infinitejester on May 19, 2011 11:42 AM

    Sometimes it feels like the racial scars in this country are totally uncurable.

    **

    Perhaps not. But, they have to be discussed, parsed, examined and dealt with, because they were so pervasive and are still in the recent past. The Civil Rights movement happened only 50 years ago, and at that time there was still Jim Crow, lynching, unequal representation and the kind of subtle racial discrimination that still exists today. I don’t think those scars can’t be healed, but it won’t happen without examining everything that happened, and communicating those events, with proper perspective, for the benefit of future generations, so hopefully those kinds of things can’t happen again to ANYONE, not just black folks. Ignoring it gains us nothing. That’s the heavy price that slavery and discrimination put on our country, and folks will have to deal with that legacy, whether they like it or not.

  3. Sadly, Noki- I have to agree.

    I remember going to visit MM in Bed-Stuy back in the 80’s. what I remember most was the friendliness. I loved going there for holiday bbq’s and just plain hanging out. Never felt afraid, never afraid to walk around. What I admire most is that “we can do it” attitude I see in Bed-Stuy and Crown Heights. No one should underestimate the damage cause to Bed-stuy by redlining and “benign” neglect. And no one should underestimate the determination and hard work Bed-Stuy put into climbing out of that hole.

  4. McKenzie, I took that from one of my published sources, forgive me for not fact checking each and every name, and their date of birth. Kennedy went to the Astor Foundation. They helped him. That’s the important part of the story.

    If it makes you feel important, and superior, to have caught a small error, have a drink on me, congratulations.

  5. Benson, the wide eyed innocent thing doesn’t work with you, and I know what you were implying.

    Housing projects do not a community make. Moving people into huge towers does not solve the problems of poverty and unemployment. If anything, it only gives those problems a taller pot to boil in.

    Most of the projects in Bed Stuy were built after the Kennedy years. The ones that were built before were designed to be working class subsidized housing, and they stayed that way, and were nice places to live, until policies changed, and masses of the poorest of the poor were moved into them.

  6. @Infinite, With the punishing, neo-conservative, “socialism” & welfare-state-hating, shoot-self-in-own-footing bunch of conservatives we see clamoring for more and more congressional control and power today, I am afraid it may indeed be incurable.

    Wonderful piece, MM! I was riveted.

  7. Montrose;

    WOW!! That was quite a bit you read into my question.

    I don’t get it. You make quite a sweeping statement that the city government basically abandoned this area and when I question your source, you dump on me.

    Did not the city build a whole slew of housing projects in Bed-Stuy, well before Robert Kennedy ever set foot there? Does that count for something? I think it does not further our understanding to try to pin all of Bed-Stuy’s problem on outside forces.

    OK, I’ll stop. I see that discussion is not welcome here.

  8. BrooklynIsHome, all of what you mention is certainly important, and I promise to devote a column to to all three of them, as well as other issues, like the libraries. I don’t want to do it now, as it will drag the series out too long, and people will lose interest, and the important work these people did will go even further unnoticed by the rest of Brooklyn and the general population.

    I’ve lived in the community for almost thirty years, and have seen tremendous change. I’ve never felt afraid here, and have always been impressed and inspired by the people who have worked tirelessly to make this community better. Not by asking anyone to do it for them, but standing up to be counted, and then hunkering down to do the work themselves.

    The opinions of people like McKenzie, who has never had a good word for central Brooklyn on this site, don’t matter. They never have, and never will.

1 2 3 4 5