ay-site-overview-03-2008.jpg
This morning the Times has a couple articles about Atlantic Yards that more or less boil down to the following: Aspects of the mega-project aside from the Nets arena are likely to be delayed or go unrealized; Forest City Ratner has not been able to lure an anchor tenant to Miss Brooklyn, his planned office tower; and Frank Gehry’s overarching vision for AY will be severely compromised if all that’s built is the arena. In one article, Charles Bagli includes snippets of an interview with Bruce Ratner in which the developer concedes that construction of Miss Brooklyn will not begin until a tenant has been secured for the office tower; Bagli also notes that the three residential towers surrounding the arena, which are slated to have 1,000 units of housing—including many affordable units—may not happen anytime soon, since developers are finding financing harder to come by. Ratner still sounds cautiously optimistic about the first phase of AY, though. It’s not going to happen in a nanosecond, he tells the Times. I hope it’s not going to be drawn out. I’d hope that the first residential building will be done within six months of the opening of the arena, and a second one a year after that. In the second article, architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff says the possibility that all we’ll be left with is a Nets arena “feels like a betrayal of the public trust.” Ouroussoff calls on Frank Gehry to walk away from the entire development: “by pulling out he would be expressing a simple truth: At this point the Atlantic Yards development has nothing to do with the project that New Yorkers were promised. Nor does it rise to the standards Mr. Gehry has set for himself during a remarkable career.”
Slow Economy Likely to Stall Atlantic Yards [NY Times]
What Will Be Left of Gehry’s Vision for Brooklyn? [NY Times]
Ratner Admits Major AY Delays, Rising Arena Cost [AY Report]
Miss Brooklyn & Housing to Die as Arena Lives? [GL]
Bullet Points of Bagli Article [No Land Grab]
Photo by threecee.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. great day for brooklyn? i don’t understand you johnny – you move here just as brooklyn is approaching the explosion of its resurgance and all you want to do is kill it. ask the people who grew up in bk during the 40s and 50s and held things down here during tough times of the 70s and 80s whether this is a good day for brooklyn? you come here and benefit from the work these people (my parents, my grandparents) put in, and now you want to deprive these same people of the fruit of their resilience. you disgust me.

  2. The same day that the Times ran the article about AY, it ran an article about huge budget cuts in the same system. Any rational person would want to know why we can’t support our schools but have $2 billion to underwrite the Nets and Ratnerville.

    This is a great day for Brooklyn. Now let’s hope something appropriate for the area gets built – with a lot less of taxpayer money.

  3. i guess we can put this at the top of the to-do list for the rebound phase. hopefully at least some of those who were primarily responsbile for pushing delays to this point will have to live admist the stalled drawn out construction.

    now instead of demo and then new development, you’re going to have demo, empty construction sites for who knows how long, then eventually that same new development. thanks for benefiting the community.

  4. Nicolai Ouroussoff had has head in the sand if he was thinking about anything visionary from Ratner. The track record speaks for itself. Metrotech + Atlantic terminal sterile and lifeless. So, not exactly shocking that AY will turn out the same way.

  5. Nicolai Ouroussoff had has head in the sand if he was thinking about anything visionary from Ratner. The track record speaks for itself. Metrotech + Atlantic terminal sterile and lifeless. So, not exactly shocking that AY will turn out the same way.

1 5 6 7 8 9 17