ay-site-overview-03-2008.jpg
This morning the Times has a couple articles about Atlantic Yards that more or less boil down to the following: Aspects of the mega-project aside from the Nets arena are likely to be delayed or go unrealized; Forest City Ratner has not been able to lure an anchor tenant to Miss Brooklyn, his planned office tower; and Frank Gehry’s overarching vision for AY will be severely compromised if all that’s built is the arena. In one article, Charles Bagli includes snippets of an interview with Bruce Ratner in which the developer concedes that construction of Miss Brooklyn will not begin until a tenant has been secured for the office tower; Bagli also notes that the three residential towers surrounding the arena, which are slated to have 1,000 units of housing—including many affordable units—may not happen anytime soon, since developers are finding financing harder to come by. Ratner still sounds cautiously optimistic about the first phase of AY, though. It’s not going to happen in a nanosecond, he tells the Times. I hope it’s not going to be drawn out. I’d hope that the first residential building will be done within six months of the opening of the arena, and a second one a year after that. In the second article, architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff says the possibility that all we’ll be left with is a Nets arena “feels like a betrayal of the public trust.” Ouroussoff calls on Frank Gehry to walk away from the entire development: “by pulling out he would be expressing a simple truth: At this point the Atlantic Yards development has nothing to do with the project that New Yorkers were promised. Nor does it rise to the standards Mr. Gehry has set for himself during a remarkable career.”
Slow Economy Likely to Stall Atlantic Yards [NY Times]
What Will Be Left of Gehry’s Vision for Brooklyn? [NY Times]
Ratner Admits Major AY Delays, Rising Arena Cost [AY Report]
Miss Brooklyn & Housing to Die as Arena Lives? [GL]
Bullet Points of Bagli Article [No Land Grab]
Photo by threecee.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I wouldn’t blame the anti-AY people for this – it is the market.
    I do hope that somebody does get to build an office tower with a good tenant. NYC needs downtown Brooklyn to become an office area to compete with NJ. How many more buildings can they cram into Midtown and subways are too crammed going thru there.
    In the meantime – platform can be built over the train yards so will be ready for when market is ready for building.

  2. What’s interesting here is the fact that lots of people in neighborhoods like Ft. Greene, Prospect Heights and Clinton Hill sold their properties in order to avoid AY’s eventual negative impact on property values. If the project gets derailed now in some serious way, those folks will have cashed in all their chips unnecessarily.

  3. H * E * L * L * O……!

    i thought the ny market was immune (HA)!

    ratner (AND gehry for that matter) should jump on the green bandwagon if they want to even attempt to rescue this doomed development.

    *that, and WHY THE ___ aren’t ALL of these new developments green?! greenest city my butt~!

  4. “I wonder: will all the anti-AY crowd be happy with this?”

    As a card-carrying member of the anti-AY crowd, I can honestly say “YES, I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT I LOVE IT I LOVE IT I LOVE IT I LOVE IT!!!!!

1 15 16 17