What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Pete, this should interest you: From taxprof.blog

    “The Tax Foundation has released a fascinating report showing which states benefit from federal tax and spending policies, and which states foot the bill.

    US 50 States MapThe report shows that of the 32 states (and the District of Columbia) that are “winners” — receiving more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes — 76% are Red States that voted for George Bush in 2000. Indeed, 17 of the 20 (85%) states receiving the most federal spending per dollar of federal taxes paid are Red States. Here are the Top 10 states that feed at the federal trough (with Red States highlighted in bold):

    States Receiving Most in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:

    1. D.C. ($6.17)
    2. North Dakota ($2.03)
    3. New Mexico ($1.89)
    4. Mississippi ($1.84)
    5. Alaska ($1.82)
    6. West Virginia ($1.74)
    7. Montana ($1.64)
    8. Alabama ($1.61)
    9. South Dakota ($1.59)
    10. Arkansas ($1.53)

    In contrast, of the 16 states that are “losers” — receiving less in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes — 69% are Blue States that voted for Al Gore in 2000. Indeed, 11 of the 14 (79%) of the states receiving the least federal spending per dollar of federal taxes paid are Blue States. Here are the Top 10 states that supply feed for the federal trough (with Blue States highlighted in bold):

    States Receiving Least in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:

    1. New Jersey ($0.62)
    2. Connecticut ($0.64)
    3. New Hampshire ($0.68)
    4. Nevada ($0.73)
    5. Illinois ($0.77)
    6. Minnesota ($0.77)
    7. Colorado ($0.79)
    8. Massachusetts ($0.79)
    9. California ($0.81)
    10. New York ($0.81)

    Two states — Florida and Oregon (coincidentally, the two closest states in the 2000 Presidential election) — received $1.00 in federal spending for each $1.00 in federal taxes paid.

    and this:
    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/02/20/gop_governors

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1209/Antisocialist_Bachmann_got_250k_in_federal_farm_subsidies.html

    As for Palin:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090103148.html

  2. i have no sympathy for single struggling mothers with five children. newsflash! if you didnt have 5 children you might not be struggling, and your man wouldnt have left you! babies dont keep men around, ladies!

    *rob*

  3. mopar, my point on harping on the unions is that she may actually lose her job if the unions don’t take an across-the-board pay cut. The union leadership resists this and the result is layoffs making some shoulder all the burden for the many.

    Unions are actually the worst thing for many of their own members.

  4. I know someone who works for the MTA and is supporting five children by herself, including one in college. I can see money is very tight. Her stoop has disintegrated and I know she tried to get it fixed but couldn’t afford the $2,000 the guy was quoting (neither could I). I can see she needs other repairs too. Dave, you are rolling in the dough compared to her.

1 2 3