open-thread-icon.jpg


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I subscribe to the NYRB but the always-same-direction political bias leaves me a bit disgruntled sometimes. I wish there was more middle ground political articles and less binary left/right categorizations.

  2. “i dont even know what that means”

    You know, an umlaut, the two little dots that sometimes go after a consecutive vowel to tell the reader that the first “o” sound if different from the second “o” sound. Co-Op-erate. Not, cOOp-erate.

    Anyway, I was agreeing, I find it pretentious, the word cooperate is well known. Kinda like dropping a hyphen once a compound word becomes commonplace.

  3. jackal,

    Sometimes I like the New Yorker, sometimes I find it a bit insufferable. But the writing and editing there is still practiced like a craft. My sense is that you appreciate good workmanship, so not a surprise you would like it.

    P.S. This will help you enjoy the New Yorker. I read somewhere that the real caption to every drawing in the caption contest (back page) is “God, what an asshole!” So now I look at all the drawings that way, and it generally fits.

  4. Rob, you also thought City Journal was not conserrvative. Do you not read Theodore Dalyrmple’s column?

    Best highbrow magazines: n+1, New York Review of Books

    Best short story magazines: Ploughshares, Prairie Schooner, Glimmer Train

  5. “the new yorker is WAY too fucking pretentious”

    Predictable comment.

    No surprise— I love the NYer.

    Actually, this year I would like you to BBQ on the deck, CGar, it was built wrong (nothing drains from under it), and I need a reason to ask the LL to rebuild it! ; )

1 49 50 51 52 53 54