Register to leave a comment, or log in if you already have an account
…and I take any argument along the lines of:
“The President shouldn’t have to prove anything”
as too ass-kissy.
Any person who has the future of 320 million Americans in their hands should be ready to provide basic disclosures.
I mean the sort I had to provide to get my daughter enrolled in public school.
Mainstream republicans cringed whenever they heard the birthers just as mainstream Democrats did whenver nancy pelosi or Maxine Waters opened their mouths.
“m4l, there are a hell of a lot of loonies in the Democrats too and it seems they haven’t been booted out. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”
I agree dibs,
Dan Rather is still seen as a “hero” of the Left.
I even believe he still believes he was right on the forged Bush National Guard papers.
For a few years, Amazon has been the poster child for public cloud/utility computing, and was one of the first big names in the field.
The have been pretty successful at it, and signed up a number of mid-sized web companies to use their services.
One of their selling points was that they were expects in all aspects of running a data center, and they could offer higher reliability than their customers could build themselves.
Last week, they had a huge outage that took a number of their customers sites down and now they are saying that some of their data may never be recovered.
legion, you do agree in hindsight it was a stupid issue/angle the Repub were pushing with this certificate issue right?
M4L,
I would agree it was imprudent.
If you noticed. This is the first time I’ve brought this issue up.
I didn’t feel I could possibly know enough on it to make a judgement.
While the previously released “certificate of live birth” did not provide full disclosure in my opinion. I felt that the honus was on the opposition (the “birthers”) to prove their case without just hot air.
The only resolution would have been an actual certificate from that time period (as has apparently been provided) or for the “birthers” to bring out people who were there under oath.
m4l, there are a hell of a lot of loonies in the Democrats too and it seems they haven’t been booted out. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
…and I take any argument along the lines of:
“The President shouldn’t have to prove anything”
as too ass-kissy.
Any person who has the future of 320 million Americans in their hands should be ready to provide basic disclosures.
I mean the sort I had to provide to get my daughter enrolled in public school.
Mainstream republicans cringed whenever they heard the birthers just as mainstream Democrats did whenver nancy pelosi or Maxine Waters opened their mouths.
DIBS is right. Mainstream Republicans were not birthers.
Of course that won’t stop unthinking liberals from referring to anything to the right of dead center as “crackpots.”
By daveinbedstuy on April 27, 2011 2:08 PM
“m4l, there are a hell of a lot of loonies in the Democrats too and it seems they haven’t been booted out. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”
I agree dibs,
Dan Rather is still seen as a “hero” of the Left.
I even believe he still believes he was right on the forged Bush National Guard papers.
For a few years, Amazon has been the poster child for public cloud/utility computing, and was one of the first big names in the field.
The have been pretty successful at it, and signed up a number of mid-sized web companies to use their services.
One of their selling points was that they were expects in all aspects of running a data center, and they could offer higher reliability than their customers could build themselves.
Last week, they had a huge outage that took a number of their customers sites down and now they are saying that some of their data may never be recovered.
Is there anything more disingenuous than a member of the opposition party advising what’s best for your own party?
One’s about 6 inches & 2 are about 2 inches.
By more4less on April 27, 2011 1:56 PM
legion, you do agree in hindsight it was a stupid issue/angle the Repub were pushing with this certificate issue right?
M4L,
I would agree it was imprudent.
If you noticed. This is the first time I’ve brought this issue up.
I didn’t feel I could possibly know enough on it to make a judgement.
While the previously released “certificate of live birth” did not provide full disclosure in my opinion. I felt that the honus was on the opposition (the “birthers”) to prove their case without just hot air.
The only resolution would have been an actual certificate from that time period (as has apparently been provided) or for the “birthers” to bring out people who were there under oath.
m4l, there are a hell of a lot of loonies in the Democrats too and it seems they haven’t been booted out. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.