Open Thread
Need a Hand?
Your Next Project Starts with BrownstonerMost Recent Articles
Need a Hand?
Your Next Project Starts with Brownstoner
sorry m4l — I was 300.
“Because if your kids believe it, then it could do more damage to their critical thinking than television or the movie “Cars.†”
JB;
Why thank you!
I have no doubt that you are all for “diversity”, right?
300
By benson on April 18, 2011 3:55 PM
“It was benson, who obviously thinks make up will cover any flaw.”
Not really, but it would sure make alot of feminists look a whole lot better
lol benson,
you are asking for it today!
I think we have discovered bxgrl’s true agenda at last.
She is anti-men’s rights! ;o)
Legion — YES. CO2 is part of the animal respiratory process. And methane is also a byproduct of (many) animals’ digestive process.
These are both greenhouse gasses.
GUESS WHAT?! The increase in world-wide wealth has increased the consumption of beef… in near hyperbolic amounts! And do you know what the impact of more cows is?! A HUGE increase in methane! Methane is counted a 20X CO2 when greenhouse gasses are calculated. CO2 is used as the standard unit.
One COW produces the equivalent of 4,000 lbs of CO2 per year.
One CAR (15,000 miles, 30 miles/gallon) produces the equivalent of 10,000 lbs of CO2 per year.
There are 1.5 billion cows and buffalos and 532 million cars in the world. COWS produce 112% the amount of CO2 as all of the cars in the world.
In short — go stick you “natural processes” up your bung hole. 🙂
“JB – Why would I care if my kids go to church? It’s a nice community thing to do and I find all of the God stuff pretty innocuous (it’s the bible, not a bag of crack and a $20 bill for giving handies in the grand central bathroom forchrissakes). I don’t happen to believe (or disbelieve) in God but it’s a perfectly good way to get integrated into a community. And episcopalians are pretty reasonable.â€
Because if your kids believe it, then it could do more damage to their critical thinking than television or the movie “Cars.â€
tybur6,
put it this way,
when Nancy Pelosi gets the same treatment as Michelle Bachmann for saying things like:
“We’ll have to vote on it before we can see what’s in it”
Pelosi speaking on the largest entitlement bill in a century.
or
“food stamps and welfare are a great form of economic stimulation”
Pelosi speaking on entitlements as economic stimulus.
…then will I consider that there is a fair handed evaluation of candidates in the press.
“why is it that everyone driving faster than you is considered an idiot and everyone driving slower than you is a moron?”
Rhetorical question?
“It was benson, who obviously thinks make up will cover any flaw.”
Not really, but it would sure make alot of feminists look a whole lot better.