open-thread-icon.jpg


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. “the fact that no one has proven (scientifically)
    the existence of a higher being, that you
    cannot say that God doesn’t exist.”

    Legion, it’s complicated for me, but this is why part of me leans toward agnosticism. There’s too much about ourselves and our world and our universe, etc., that we can not begin to understand, so I can not say with certainty that God does not exist.

    Again, however, that said, personally, I really do not believe that God exists, which clearly makes me more of an atheist.

    And yet there is that nagging part of me that can not say for sure . . . Can you say conundrum?

    Nytol!

  2. bfarwell,
    If I was reading your posts correctly,
    you are pointing out that it is NOT valid
    to say that something (God) exists just because
    someone else hasn’t disproven it.

    Wouldn’t the inverse be true then,
    that the fact that no one has proven (scientifically)
    the existence of a higher being, that you
    cannot say that God doesn’t exist.

    That seems to be just a part of the conundrum.

    I won’t get into the perception part as I have gotten into that at length already.
    What we perceive is but a small fraction of what is going on around us.

  3. “an assumption of a particular set of characteristics that are possessed by whatever is perceived” (belief)
    “Perception – apprehension by senses” (perception)

    I think both of those are sensible definitions.
    Point I was trying to make was that they limit the sphere of the ‘perceived world’ very much, such that almost everything would be a matter of ‘belief’, not just metaphysical questions about God.

    I think God is perceived as well as believed in (in fact I’m not sure if there is such a thing as in God intellectually if one doesn’t perceive anything). I expect most Christians would have the same view.

1 15 16 17 18 19 78