Open Thread


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Quote:
    “I attended 2 weddings in California for same sex couple who had been together for more than 10 years.”
    And…..were they monogamous during the 10+ year period?

    As far as I could tell they were, although that does not mean much. I know that one of the 4 people identified as bisexual.

    During that time, I doubt they knew that my wife and I were having relationships with others, although my wife did “come out” as bisexual during that time period when the couples were married.

  2. Rob – they had the most beautiful american Staffordshire Pitbull on – really gorgeous – didn’t get picked in his group! I just don’t get it! – I agree – I think they are biased
    do you know that terriers have won 45 out of 101 times Best In Show at the Westminster – I mean talk about biased. UGH!

  3. i don’t get the park slope parents thing. raising kids is NOT that hard, it’s not rocket science, stop being such freak helicopter parents and let your kids grow into what they wanna be, not turning them into the disgusting little beans you want them to be! is it possible to infiltrate that board? if any S.S. people are reading this, google park slope parents message board and go fuck with them! (i think you gotta register tho and get accepted?)

    *rob*

  4. “There is NO GUARANTEE that there will be one match after 366 encounters, by the very nature of a distribution. ”

    Benson, you are 100% wrong about this. If there are 366 people standing in a room there is a 100% chance of a shared birthday.

    Actually 367 because of leap year.

1 54 55 56 57 58 63