I’ll second you on the dialogue, benson. I don’t mind debating ideas- what gets me going is when someone can’t just disagree, but they have to insult you for thinking differently.
But I do have to disagree with you -for the most part that thread was very lively and interesting. Yes- there was some snarking, but in general it was a good discussion. You and I disagree on quite a few things- and usually I enjoy discussing with you except that you get pissy right away.
Yesterday you lumped me, joe and Whuh together implying that joe and I post the same insults and derision that Whuh does. You also know that is patently false and I find it hugely insulting. Joe and I might not agree with your ideas but we hardly insulted you- I know I certainly didn’t.
A few days ago I was having a dialogue with BHO in a thread that was several days old (ie–nobody else should have been aware that there was still active discussion going on, but BHO and I were going at each other over some bullshit) when all of a sudden, while waiting for BHO to respond in comes What with a typical What-ism. That made me super suspicious because there is no reason anyone else would have been aware of an active dialogue in a thread that old.
If it is performance “art” (parentheses indicate a low opinion of its artistic merits) he/she has created two distinct but symbiotically linked personas, both misanthropic but in different tones.
wasder, there was an instance earlier this week I think where BHO used The What’s exact tagline and it didn’t seem to be linked to anything the What said. That did get me a bit suspicious…
I thought it was very odd nobody pointed it out, actually.
wasder, that must have been another time. I’m positive BHO used What’s.
This BHO/What mystery is as intriguing as the true identity of Miss Pell and all the other Miss logins.
“BHO used The What’s exact tagline”
Actually Biff, What used BHO’s new tagline “Team Bear we go hard” (whatever that actually means).
***Team Nice We Go Reasonable***
***Bid half off original personas***
***someday this war that is only in my head will end***
Or something like that.
Like right now!!!!!
bxgirl and benson often have dustups that are worth reading. Disagreeing without being disagreeable.
I’ll second you on the dialogue, benson. I don’t mind debating ideas- what gets me going is when someone can’t just disagree, but they have to insult you for thinking differently.
But I do have to disagree with you -for the most part that thread was very lively and interesting. Yes- there was some snarking, but in general it was a good discussion. You and I disagree on quite a few things- and usually I enjoy discussing with you except that you get pissy right away.
Yesterday you lumped me, joe and Whuh together implying that joe and I post the same insults and derision that Whuh does. You also know that is patently false and I find it hugely insulting. Joe and I might not agree with your ideas but we hardly insulted you- I know I certainly didn’t.
A few days ago I was having a dialogue with BHO in a thread that was several days old (ie–nobody else should have been aware that there was still active discussion going on, but BHO and I were going at each other over some bullshit) when all of a sudden, while waiting for BHO to respond in comes What with a typical What-ism. That made me super suspicious because there is no reason anyone else would have been aware of an active dialogue in a thread that old.
If it is performance “art” (parentheses indicate a low opinion of its artistic merits) he/she has created two distinct but symbiotically linked personas, both misanthropic but in different tones.
wasder, there was an instance earlier this week I think where BHO used The What’s exact tagline and it didn’t seem to be linked to anything the What said. That did get me a bit suspicious…