Impossible to answer without knowing more about the other player.
How badly do I need the money and how badly does he? What are the break points?
In my case, if it’s really $100 at stake, I would be fine with 50/50, but if he countered with 90 for him and 10 for me my response would be “fuck you motherfucker, my offer just went down to a penny for you and 99.99 for me.” And we would both walk away with nothing. All because 100 isn’t real money to me.
For a million bucks the outcome would be totally diff’t. A million bucks is a lot to me.
Lechacal, you are correct about game theory – which is usually taught as Math. Von Neumann was a mathematician. (OK I probably misspelled his name).
Please temper your spelling hall monitor instincts with common sense.
dcb: was it a typo that you omitted two commas, as well?
Pains me again to agree with le jackal, but, again, I must agree with every word of his 1:38 post.
The more powerful player wins.
The more powerful player is the one who has more money to begin with. The ability to get nothing is power. The need to get something is weakness.
Like life.
m4l, shelling out all that money to those boys, I hope he got some choice meat!!!
Impossible to answer without knowing more about the other player.
How badly do I need the money and how badly does he? What are the break points?
In my case, if it’s really $100 at stake, I would be fine with 50/50, but if he countered with 90 for him and 10 for me my response would be “fuck you motherfucker, my offer just went down to a penny for you and 99.99 for me.” And we would both walk away with nothing. All because 100 isn’t real money to me.
For a million bucks the outcome would be totally diff’t. A million bucks is a lot to me.
CGar, no need to be spiteful. go 50:50 then call me up to share in your new found drinking $$$
“inn town”
Dibs, that was an obvious typo – not a spelling error!
Please temper your spelling hall monitor instincts with common sense.
DCB: that is game theory, not mathematics.