Open Thread


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. “kindly indulge me with the following:

    1). Full Names, sex and Address”

    Wait, Samuel Reid, Esq. wants you to “indulge” him with sex in order to present your claim for the inheritance? Doesn’t that violate one of the ethical canons? SSC&J, do we have any research on that?

  2. “within a stone’s throw (of something) and (just) a stone’s throw away (from something); (just) a stone’s throw (from something)

    Fig. very close (to something). (Possibly as close as the distance one could throw a stone. It usually refers to a distance much greater than one could throw a stone.)”

    (Truthfully, “stone’s throat” sounds cooler)

  3. OK, that’s what I get for being all snarky and correcting the broker, a typo-laden post of my own. CGar, you idiot, you left off the left paren and it’s no more a “stone’s throat” than it is a “stone throw”.

1 5 6 7 8 9 29