CG, i also recall that follow up being a little harsh but then again didn’t see lech’s expression when he wrote it.
something about biff giving up his clark kent so lech would feel more comfortable hanging out with him.
Lech, I think CG is referring to you calling me a “super anonymous” person and fun to drink with in a group but not someone you would be comfy drinking with one on one because you don’t know me. It didn’t bother me. In fact, it was a nice change from typically being told I give out too much information! And I think you understand and appreciate my hesitance to give out a lot of personal details (given I have kids), so it’s all good.
“i would suspect that biff is a little hurt by lechacal’s comment in last week’s open thread. it was a bit harsh”
Huh?? I have tangled with plenty of regulars, but never Biff. What did I say to Biff?
Posted by: lechacal at September 28, 2009 12:27 PM
Lech, I’m surprised you’re that gullible in believing that. even if you did offend Biff, he has thick enough skin to let it bounce off. Stare might be intimidating but not that perceptive
Benson, if not for you, there would be no action on blog today. Hey, interesting to hear you don’t like brownstones – was under impression you sold a brownstone b4 buying your current condo
I agree with Lech. I don’t recall ever having a run-in with him and he didn’t say anything to me last week that I found offensive. If you’re referring to the conversation about him having drinks with DH, I was totally kidding about feeling left out.
Let me test Biff’s thick skin.
– Biff is an idiot
– Biff is a stiff but not where it counts
– Biff is dreaming not dreamie
– Biff rigged the prez vote
CG, i also recall that follow up being a little harsh but then again didn’t see lech’s expression when he wrote it.
something about biff giving up his clark kent so lech would feel more comfortable hanging out with him.
Lech, I think CG is referring to you calling me a “super anonymous” person and fun to drink with in a group but not someone you would be comfy drinking with one on one because you don’t know me. It didn’t bother me. In fact, it was a nice change from typically being told I give out too much information! And I think you understand and appreciate my hesitance to give out a lot of personal details (given I have kids), so it’s all good.
“i would suspect that biff is a little hurt by lechacal’s comment in last week’s open thread. it was a bit harsh”
Huh?? I have tangled with plenty of regulars, but never Biff. What did I say to Biff?
Posted by: lechacal at September 28, 2009 12:27 PM
Lech, I’m surprised you’re that gullible in believing that. even if you did offend Biff, he has thick enough skin to let it bounce off. Stare might be intimidating but not that perceptive
“biff did I say something nasty to you last week?”
Lech, not at all and that is what made me feel left out the most! 🙂
there was a follow up comment that i thought was harsh, but as long as nobody else did then i’m glad to hear all is well with everyone.
Biffy, isn’t working as bad as eating on Yom Kippur? Should have taken the day off and played with Champettes.
Benson, if not for you, there would be no action on blog today. Hey, interesting to hear you don’t like brownstones – was under impression you sold a brownstone b4 buying your current condo
I agree with Lech. I don’t recall ever having a run-in with him and he didn’t say anything to me last week that I found offensive. If you’re referring to the conversation about him having drinks with DH, I was totally kidding about feeling left out.