Gowanus Superfund Coming to a Head
UPDATE 9:46 am: Pardon Me For Asking is reporting that the EPA has just announced that is has put the Gowanus Canal on the Superfund list. We can’t find a press release or mention on the EPA site though. UPDATE 10:41 a.m.: The Times has an article up now, complete with this statement: After conducting…

UPDATE 9:46 am: Pardon Me For Asking is reporting that the EPA has just announced that is has put the Gowanus Canal on the Superfund list. We can’t find a press release or mention on the EPA site though.
UPDATE 10:41 a.m.: The Times has an article up now, complete with this statement: After conducting our own evaluations and consulting extensively with the many people who have expressed interest in the future of the Gowanus Canal and the surrounding area, we have determined that a Superfund designation is the best path to a cleanup of this heavily contaminated and long neglected urban waterway, Judith Enck, the E.P.A. regional administrator, said in a statement.”
With a community meeting scheduled for Thursday (P.S. 58 at 7 p.m.), Crain’s takes a close look at the “To Superfund or Not to Superfund” question that is currently dividing various constituencies along and around the Gowanus Canal. If the site is placed on the Superfund list, it almost certainly will be the death knell of the mega real estate projects slated for the area. Given the way Superfund sites work, it could be a decade or more from now before clean up starts, said David Von Spreckelsen, vice president at Toll Brothers, told Crain’s. We just don’t have that time horizon. We will most likely walk away from the properties. Not only that, it could affect the ability of homeowners within a half-mile of the site to get a mortgage. The developers and other stakeholders in the area favor a plan put forth by the city for a faster clean-up to the tune of $165 million. One such position is taken by Buddy Scotto, longtime neighborhood resident and activist. Here’s what he wrote to the pro-Superfunders in a letter we got our hands on:
I take a back seat to no one with regard to my commitment to our environment and if I believed that you had a better way, I would willingly accept the fact that I might never see the affordable housing and other economic development initiatives along the canal that I long ago envisioned. You, however, come to us not with an open hand bearing gifts but with a hammer growling threats. I willingly reach out my hand to receive the $175 million dollars offered by our City, and I would be more than pleased to accept federal funds to move the remediation of the canal forward, but instead you only offer us the prospect of years of delay through litigation.
Where do you stand on the issue now?
Gowanus Canal Faces Crucial Cleanup Decision [Crain’s]
The Other Dead Zone Around the Gowanus [Brooklyn Paper]
Photo by sahocevar
“Increased cancer rates and many other health risks are real.”
Posted by: lincolnlimestone at March 2, 2010 12:37 PM
Can you point to any documentation showing that there are “increased cancer rates and many other health risks” for those who live near the canal?
f*** I live a block away from canal and will probably have to put my house on market soon. this is a nightmare if really true about mortgages.
f*** I live a block away from canal and will probably have to put my house on market soon. this is a nightmare if really true about mortgages.
Actually, there are surprisingly few old ladies living in this area, unless by “old” you mean “50.” If half the population of Staten Island gets cancer in the next decade, you’ll know why.
Nice poll voting widget thing!
Thank you, lincolnlimestone, for your informed contribution. I was under the impression that the bad stuff lay entombed in the muck.
There was a previous story about Toll Brothers and their legal obligations to buy the site were deemed null and void based on future discovery that found the site to be toxic and, in particular, any EPA involvement. they seem ti have a good case to not only walk away but also get their down payment back.
EPA and Superfund are a joke, but unfortunately, it’s the best clean up tool existing today.
As someone who reviews Environmental reports as part of my job, you couldn’t pay me enough to live anywhere close to the Gowanus (or Williamsburg for that matter). Issues like vapor intrusion are only starting to be understood and accounted for. Who knows what they’ll find next.
Increased cancer rates and many other health risks are real.
hmmm, if my choices are:
1) City Plan that relies on “voluntary” contributions from past polluters to fund the cleanup as well as on federal money that requires legislation to first pass in Congress (and is more developer “get it done fast†friendlyâ€); or
2) Superfund designation that carries a stigma (to people that don’t already know the extent of the pollution in the Canal!) but has the power of lawsuits to get proper funding from polluters and is a more thorough cleanup, then …
I’ll take Option 2 please.
Also, the mortgage scare tactic is nonsense if you read the regulations.