Does Size Matter?
New York Magazine this week discusses the pros and cons of large and small brokerage firms. The boutiques tout their level of personal attention and special knowledge of particular neighborhoods while the biggies point to their marketing reach and resources. If anyone wants to put their record up of how many $10 million [plus] deals…
New York Magazine this week discusses the pros and cons of large and small brokerage firms. The boutiques tout their level of personal attention and special knowledge of particular neighborhoods while the biggies point to their marketing reach and resources. If anyone wants to put their record up of how many $10 million [plus] deals they’ve made, we’re happy to do so, says Corcoran president Pam Liebman. How about in Brooklyn? Have you had better experiences with large or small? And does it matter whether you’re buying or selling?
Small Wonders [New York]
Photo from funnyjunk.com
Why would a seller want to list with a broker such as Corcoran if most of the agents work for the buyers? If the commission is paid by the seller that seller should have every agent working for him or her. The buyer would have all the advantages and the seller loses. It seems the smaller firms can provide better service for a seller.
The seller pays 100% of the comission so Corcoran is playing around with fire if they think that they have agents acting as the buyer’s broker. I don’t think they disclose that to their sellers when they sign a listing agreement so that they know that only the listing agent is working for them and everybody else at the firm is working on the other side. This is just confusing the buyers or lying to sellers I think.
I know Corcoran agents in the Fort Greene office who live in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed Stuy, Crown Heights, Prospect Heights, and Park Slope. Regardless, everyone I’ve dealt with has been very knowledgeable about all of these areas — it’s kind of hard not to be, when they’re all so close to each other.
And if you’re working with a broker as a buyer, that broker is working for you. You run into trouble when you’re dealing with the same broker who has the listing. Typcial of the problem encountered when dealing with small firms — they don’t co-broke, aren’t members of REBNY, etc. If you go to an open house alone (without a broker) you’re lost.
NYS defines three types of arrangements here, and requires their disclosure for all sales and rentals of 1 – 4 family properties. First you have separate buyer’s and seller’s agents (with both working for different firms, i.e, Corcoran and BHS); next you have one broker (like only Corcoran), but two different individuals, one working with the buyer and one with the seller. The least desirable is “dual agency,” in which one person represents both. This can only be done, under NYS law, with the written consent of both parties, who must acknowledge that, “the agent will not be able to provide the full range of fiduciary duties to” either party (taken from the state’s agency disclosure form). Any broker in this situation who doesn’t get you to sign this form is violating NYS law.
So, sorry, anon 3:15, it just isn’t true that they’re all seller’s agents. Maybe you should give it another try, by going first to visit a broker and then going with him/her to see the properties.
I sold my place through Brown Harris Stevens in Park Slope. They really know what they are doing in that office. They showed it all the time, staffed the open houses and handled everything for me. I was thrilled to get away from Corcoran’s corporate approach. They have a ton of agents and a lot of them just plain scare me.
The correction in the market will weed out some of the less talented or less hardworking agents, this coming year.
Three years ago I tried to use a small broker to sell my Brooklyn Heights apartment. Nobody even came looking.The listing was there for a month, and we took it off the market. A few months later I went to Corcoran, which suggested an aggressive price. Within a week there were two offers at asking. The Corcoran broker lived in the building, so she knew it, but still — a pretty good example of why a larger brokerage might be better.
My experience in searching for a home in Bed-Stuy made me think that they’re all worthless if you’re a buyer. Since they’re seller’s agents and it was/is a hot area no one had an incentive to provide you with any real service. We met with at least 20 agents over the course of 2 years. Pls spare me the hate mail about how we must have had a laundry list of must-haves – we were disillusioned long before we started looking. BK=Wild Wild West of real estate
Crouchback’s question is a great one. I have a terrific (big firm) broker who has lived in the neighborhood for years, sold me my current place and is 100% on top of prices/sales, co-op board reputations and residents, and all the real-estate gossip. When I expanded my recent townhouse search outside her area, I was disturbed at how little she seemed to know and how sloppy she seemed – she gave me a lazy and inaccurate list of comparables, fell back on brokerspeak rather than real knowledge in pointing out the selling points of properties, and was in no way equipped to give me the insight that makes her such an asset in my current nabe.
Having said that, my encounter with one small firm, Heights Berkeley, was way less than impressive.
As a seller, I’d want the reach and advertising clout of a big firm as long as my broker was informed and preferably lived in the area. As a buyer, I’d prefer a small local broker OR a big-firm broker with excellent area knowledge.
The only thing that small ones are good for are for RENTALS, since they know the old local landlords and usually have below-market rents and sometimes a 1-month-rent broker fee, and more inventory. When it comes to SALES, the only thing that small ones are good for are the few listings of old locals that are again wooed into low listing prices!