bubble-test-1009.jpgIt’s been two and a half years since the last time we took a reader survey. When we took the last survey the market was still in the throes of optimism; now, as we all know, the world’s a slightly different place. So while we gotta do this so that we can have some fresh data to give potential advertisers, it’ll also be interesting to see how the demographics and psychology of the readership has shifted. As always, we’ll share the data with you and, as always, we thank you for your participation. If you have five minutes, please take the survey here.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I took the survey, even though PLG wasn’t listed as a place for investment. I listed “Crown Hts., even though (sorry M.M.) that’s really my second choice.

    BTW, my income is under $250,000 and was less than that figure even before I retired. However, IMO I’m rich, because I have everything I want!

  2. I’m an old lady, LOL. Retired, zero debt, own my condo free and clear and can live nicely on investment income <30k !!
    I will let you young folks pay my social security starting sometime next year, just gravy from my perspective.

  3. I got tripped up too with “trustworthiness of the Brownstoner brand.” Was not sure what the brand was. Could not help taking into account the variable trustworthiness of the comments. That lead to me rating it a 3. But maybe I’m misinterpreting. I’m not a freakin advertising executive over here. I think I messed up . . . . I think it should have been higher. Sorry. I think despite the variable trustworthiness of the comments, that the “brand” has higher trustworthiness than a “3.” More like “4”. Can I have a do over? Am I overthinking this?

1 2 3 4 5