REBNY Issues Mid-Year Brooklyn Market Report
The mid-year report on the Brooklyn market from the Real Estate Board of New York just came out and there aren’t a lot of surprises. Given the time lag, however, a reader could be forgiven for thinking there was no correction underway. The report compares the first six months of 2006 against the first six…
The mid-year report on the Brooklyn market from the Real Estate Board of New York just came out and there aren’t a lot of surprises. Given the time lag, however, a reader could be forgiven for thinking there was no correction underway. The report compares the first six months of 2006 against the first six months of 2005. Since it only measures closed deals and most deals take a solid three months from accepted offer to closing, it can’t reflect much deal-making after the end of March. Regardless, it’s always fun to look at the numbers. So wadda we got? Median apartment prices across the borough were up 8.4% while one- and two-family houses were up 20%. Price per square foot was $536 for co-ops and condos and $331 for houses. The median price for an apartment jumped 30% to $520 in Brooklyn Heights, 28% to $385,000 in Clinton Hill and 38% to $556 in Fort Greene. (Fort Greene higher than Brooklyn Heights!) Price per square for for one- and two-family houses was up 35% to $779 in Park Slope, 38% to $311 in Bed Stuy and 42% to $451 in Clinton Hill. Like last year, the priciest nabe by far was Dumbo, where the average price was $790 per square foot; the cheapest area in the survey was Bed Stuy with average apartment prices of $301 (up from $254 in the first half of ’05). In the townhouse market, Brooklyn Heights was by far the most expensive: Houses sold for an average of $3.1 million.
Don’t forget Concord Village has doormen and grounds so maint a bit high . And I think gas maybe included in maint. figure. From what I see still a good deal there..even if a bit sterile..if can get apt that isn’t on low floor facing Tillary (bridge backup traffic).
Easy walk to Dumbo and shops of Brooklyn Hts.
The sentence doesn’t make sense: “The median price for an apartment jumped 30% to $520 in Brooklyn Heights, 28% to $385,000 in Clinton Hill and 38% to $556 in Fort Greene.” Is it $385 per square foot in Clinton Hill? Or are the median sale prices $520K, $385K and $556K for apartments in those neighborhoods?
The board at Concord Village is one of the worst in the city. It’s a crap set of buildings in a crap part of town, but they act like they’re on 64th and Madison. Yuck.
i was on the market to purchase a 1 bdrm recently, but was concerned about the resale value at 75 henry (and also at concord village). it’s true – you do get a lot for your money, but it always seems like there’s a ton of inventory on the market and it just languishes there for months.
why no mention of cobble hill, carroll gardens, prospect heights, crown heights etc?
Any info on Crown Heights and Prospect Heights in there?
I always think these figures end up being misleading and misconstrued by media and public.
You’ll know have people claiming FtGr in more expensive than BklynHts.
The mix of what is was on market (new vs old/large vs small/condo vs coop) and # of apts sold (small numbers) easily twist results.
(ps Concord Village is east of Cadman Plaza – red brick 50’s bldgs on Adams St. Cadman Plaza west is Mitchell-Lama complex where maybe part has left program- from 60’s-70’s)
the 3 buildings you see in the north heights were all once Mitchell Lamas. 75 Henry privatized a few years ago and they are coops. the other 2 are still part of the city. (one is still in discussion to go private but nothing yet). I’ve seen them at 75 Henry and you get a lot for your money, they just usually need new kitchens and bathrooms!
i thought those high-rises were part of concord village. at very least, 75 henry st. apartments are always on the market.