NYT Real Estate Classified's Redesign a Real Letdown
Without any fanfare that we’re aware of, the New York Times launched a new version of its real estate classifieds yesterday. The result? A mess, as we found yesterday afternoon as we tried to look for House of the Day candidates. Putting in a price range of $500,000 to $2 million yielded an error message;…

Without any fanfare that we’re aware of, the New York Times launched a new version of its real estate classifieds yesterday. The result? A mess, as we found yesterday afternoon as we tried to look for House of the Day candidates. Putting in a price range of $500,000 to $2 million yielded an error message; narrowing the list of available listings using the fields in the left-hand sidebar was a cumbersome, time-consuming and often error-prone process. As one reader pointed out to us via email, you can no longer select multiple property types at once; in addition, her saved searches and alerts were wiped out in the “upgrade.” The list goes on. All we want from the site is to be able to select multiple property types and multiple neighborhoods within a certain price range and see the results. This is no longer possible. Why did they do this? Our best guess is that it has something to do with trying to broaden the geographic reach of the service, based upon the prominence given to the initial search box. Unfortunately, they may have jeopardized a much sought-after local monopoly in the process. Or, as the reader who wrote to us said, “I would imagine that others, like myself, will be very disappointed at their new real estate site and be less likely to use it in the future. [The new site] is not in the interest of regular readers and users of The Times real estate site and searches.” Let’s hope they can rectify the problems quickly.
“What is up with all these companies that update web sites that are then disfunctional? How do these people keep their jobs?”
Speaking as someone who’s been building web pages professionally for more than a decade, I can guarantee you that the developers a) know it’s broken and b) were forced to push it out before it was ready by people higher up on the chain who just wanted to be able to say they launched something.
Anyway, I’ve just been using Trulia. Apparently I was missing all the FSBO’s, which sucks, especially if they’re not longer accessible via the NYT website either.
DIBS, believe it or not, there are other sections on Craigslist besides the Personals.
One of those sections is ‘Housing’ with a sub section ‘Real Estate for Sale’…it’s quite entertaining.
I go through it for fun…the headings all in CAPS really catch my eye. And when they over use **************, I get tickled and intrigued. I almost want to buy the house in the listing.
Craigslist discussions should be limited to the Open Thread.
Craigslist is the place to find real estate listings!
marlowe…..there must be some browser issues…I just did a search for Brooklyn properties between $1.0MM and $5.0MM and got 706 of them. It seems fully functional to me here at the office. Haven’t tried it on a Mac at home yet though…
Wow. Just tried the new New York Times. Apparently there are no properties between 1 and 5 million in Brooklyn NY. Who knew.
If it aint broke…
***Bid half off peak comps***
It is unwieldy (two pages to select neighborhoods in Brooklyn!?) and the results were inaccurate — outside geography and not meeting criteria. A mess. And this was after several attempts that resulted in error messages! What is up with all these companies that update web sites that are then disfunctional? How do these people keep their jobs? This is a profit center for them. JCrew still can’t get its web site working 100% after months — how much revenue has that cost the company? There is such a lack of accountability in business — it is only most striking on Wall Street.
apparently carroll gardens doesn’t exist as a neighborhood either.